[Bug 1036130] Review request:
plv8 - javascript language extension for postgresql
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036130
Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Assignee|pkajaba(a)redhat.com |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #29 from Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to John Griffiths from comment #28)
> Any progress one this?
I think upstream moved forward a bit. Pavel Kajaba is not in team anymore,
so let's find some other maintainer.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1525984] Review Request:
python-ruamel-std-pathlib - An improvement over the standard pathlib module
and pathlib2 package
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525984
Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> ---
Are you planning to support old EPEL or something? Why bother with the python3
flag at all (Fedora's going to be dropping Python 2, not 3; flagging the other
way makes more sense in some way)? Relatedly, it would be best to figure out
why tests are failing on Python 3 now.
Use %py2_install/%py3_install macros.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1526091] Add python-sushy to Fedora
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526091
Alfredo Moralejo <amoralej(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amoralej(a)redhat.com,
| |package-review(a)lists.fedora
| |project.org
Component|Module Review |Package Review
Version|unspecified |rawhide
Blocks| |1486366 (RDO-QUEENS)
Product|Fedora Modules |Fedora
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486366
[Bug 1486366] Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Queens
packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1525490] New: Review Request:
cwm - calm window manager from OpenBSD project
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525490
Bug ID: 1525490
Summary: Review Request: cwm - calm window manager from OpenBSD
project
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: brdeoliv(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bmeneguele/cwm/fedora-raw...
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bmeneguele/cwm/fedora-raw...
Description:
Hi all,
I just finished packaging up cwm (calm window manager) from OpenBSD operating
system project and would appreciate some review to add it to Fedora's Pkg
Collection.
The official repo for cwm is a CVS repo maintained by OpenBSD userspace guys,
but this package follows an already existent git repo which unfortunately is
not maintained by me. The git repo maintainer guaranteed that no changes in
cwm's functionalities were made, just small tweaks to port it to Linux (and
other Unices). I'll keep an eye in these changes to certify nothing related to
functionality is changed.
Fedora Account System Username: bmeneguele
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1525984] Review Request:
python-ruamel-std-pathlib - An improvement over the standard pathlib module
and pathlib2 package
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525984
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
- It would be better to use the following syntax
%global with_python3 1 → %bcond_without python3
And:
%if 0%{?with_python3} → %if %{with python3}
- In the following comment, double the % to avoid macros replacement:
#Source0:
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/r/%%{pypi_name}/%%{pypi_na...
- Add _example to %doc
- BuildRequires: pytest → BuildRequires: python2-pytest
- Run the tests provided:
%check
PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:%{buildroot}%{python2_sitelib} py.test-2
%if %{with python3}
PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:%{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib} py.test-3
%endif
- Be more specific in %files:
%files -n python2-%{pname}
%license LICENSE
%doc README.rst
%{python2_sitelib}/ruamel/
%{python2_sitelib}/ruamel.std.pathlib-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info/
%{python2_sitelib}/ruamel.std.pathlib-%{version}-py?.?-nspkg.pth
%if %{with python3}
%files -n python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{pname}
%license LICENSE
%doc README.rst
%{python3_sitelib}/ruamel/
%{python3_sitelib}/ruamel.std.pathlib-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info/
%{python3_sitelib}/ruamel.std.pathlib-%{version}-py?.?-nspkg.pth
%endif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years, 6 months