https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857730
Bug ID: 857730
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Summary: Review Request: oscpack - A set of C++ classes for
packing and unpacking OSC packets
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: brendan.jones.it(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
Open Sound Control (OSC) is a content format for messaging among computers,
sound synthesizers, and other multimedia devices that are optimized for modern
networking technology.
oscpack is simply a set of classes for packing and unpacking OSC packets.
SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/oscpack-1.0.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/oscpack.spec
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: oscpack-1.0.2-2.fc16.src.rpm
oscpack-1.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
oscpack-debuginfo-1.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
oscpack-devel-1.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
oscpack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespaces -> name spaces,
name-spaces, names paces
oscpack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
oscpack.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespaces -> name
spaces, name-spaces, names paces
oscpack.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscDump
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscSendTests
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscReceiveTest
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscUnitTests
oscpack-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint oscpack-debuginfo
oscpack-debuginfo.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260911
Bug ID: 1260911
Summary: Review Request: pixz - Parallel indexed xz compressor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: i(a)cicku.me
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/pixz.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/pixz-1.0.3-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Pixz (pronounced pixie) is a parallel, indexing version of xz.
** pixz vs xz
The existing XZ Utils provide great compression in the .xz file format, but
they produce just one big block of compressed data. Pixz instead produces a
collection of smaller blocks which makes random access to the original data
possible. This is especially useful for large tarballs.
** Differences to xz
* Automatically indexes tarballs during compression.
* Supports parallel decompression, which xz does not.
* Defaults to using all available CPU cores, while xz defaults to using only
one core.
* Provides -i and -o command line options to specify input and output file.
Fedora Account System Username: cicku
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264652
--- Comment #3 from MERCIER Jonathan <bioinfornatics(a)gmail.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
=======
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gl3n
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Packa…
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/geany,
/usr/include/d, /usr/share/geany/tags
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gl3n-0.20150625-14.fc22.x86_64.rpm
gl3n-devel-0.20150625-14.fc22.x86_64.rpm
gl3n-0.20150625-14.fc22.src.rpm
gl3n.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US quaternions -> Quaternary
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lerp -> leap, leper
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slerp -> sleep, slurp
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hermite -> Hermite,
hermit, hermits
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US catmull -> cat mull,
cat-mull, Catullus
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rom -> ROM, Rom, tom
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US templated -> templates,
template, template d
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l fr dont -> don't
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l fr ment -> meant
gl3n.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0
gl3n.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gl3n-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr_FR
gl3n-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US quaternions -> Quaternary
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lerp -> leap, leper
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slerp -> sleep, slurp
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hermite -> Hermite, hermit,
hermits
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US catmull -> cat mull,
cat-mull, Catullus
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rom -> ROM, Rom, tom
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US templated -> templates,
template, template d
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l fr dont -> don't
gl3n.src: W: spelling-error %description -l fr ment -> meant
gl3n.src: W: invalid-url Source0: gl3n-20150625git20b3487.tar.xz
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 22 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
gl3n.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US quaternions -> Quaternary
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lerp -> leap, leper
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slerp -> sleep, slurp
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hermite -> Hermite,
hermit, hermits
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US catmull -> cat mull,
cat-mull, Catullus
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rom -> ROM, Rom, tom
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US templated -> templates,
template, template d
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l fr dont -> don't
gl3n.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l fr ment -> meant
gl3n.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0
gl3n.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/librt.so.1
gl3n.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libdl.so.2
gl3n.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
gl3n.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0
/lib64/libm.so.6
gl3n.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gl3n-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr_FR
gl3n-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings.
Requires
--------
gl3n (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/sbin/ldconfig
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libdruntime-ldc.so.66()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libphobos2-ldc.so.66()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
gl3n-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/pkg-config
gl3n(x86-64)
libgl3n-ldc.so.1()(64bit)
Provides
--------
gl3n:
gl3n
gl3n(x86-64)
libgl3n-ldc.so.1()(64bit)
gl3n-devel:
gl3n-devel
gl3n-devel(x86-64)
pkgconfig(gl3n)
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n gl3n
Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252831
Bug ID: 1252831
Summary: Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online
(non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB
engines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: pmackinn(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/2.2.9/percona-xtraback…
SRPM URL:
https://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/2.2.9/percona-xtraback…
Description: Percona XtraBackup is an online (non-blockable) backup solution
for InnoDB and XtraDB engines. It enables 'hot backups' to be made when using
these database engines. The tool will also backup MyISAM engine tables in a
locking fashion.
Fedora Account System Username: pmackinn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260440
Bug ID: 1260440
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-queue-async - A little helper
for asynchronous JavaScript
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: tom(a)compton.nu
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-queue-async.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-queue-async-1.0.7-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: tomh
Description:
Queue.js is yet another asynchronous helper library for JavaScript. Think
of it as a minimalist version of Async.js that allows fine-tuning over
parallelism. Or, think of it as a version of TameJs that does not use code
generation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264652
Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|leamas.alec(a)gmail.com, |package-review(a)lists.fedora
|pingou(a)pingoured.fr, |project.org
|sochotni(a)redhat.com |
Component|fedora-review |Package Review
Assignee|sochotni(a)redhat.com |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> ---
Note: it was retired on May 11th 2015 (due to a broken dep) and thus needs a
re-review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224513
Bug ID: 1224513
Summary: Review Request: python-bash8 - A pep8 equivalent for
bash scripts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: karlthered(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-bash8.spec
SRPM URL:
https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-bash8-0.1.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: A pep8 equivalent for bash scripts
Fedora Account System Username: hguemar
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260246
Bug ID: 1260246
Summary: Review Request: memtailor - C++ library of
special-purpose memory allocators
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: loganjerry(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/memtailor/memtailor.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/memtailor/memtailor-0-1.20130809.git722a30c…
Fedora Account System Username: jjames
Description: Memtailor is a C++ library of special purpose memory allocators.
It currently offers an arena allocator and a memory pool.
The main motivation to use a memtailor allocator is better and more predictable
performance than you get with new/delete. Sometimes a memtailor allocator can
also be more convenient due to the ability to free many allocations at one
time.
The Memtailor memory pool is useful if you need to do many allocations of a
fixed size. For example a memory pool is well suited to allocate the nodes in a
linked list.
You can think of the Memtailor arena allocator as being similar to stack
allocation. Both kinds of allocation are very fast and require you to
allocate/deallocate memory in last-in-first-out order. Arena allocation has the
further benefits that it stays within the C++ standard, it will not cause a
stack overflow, you can have multiple arena allocators at the same time and
allocation is not tied to a function invocation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component