[Bug 742389] New: Review Request: gtk-unico-engine - Unico Gtk+ theming engine
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-unico-engine - Unico Gtk+ theming engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742389
Summary: Review Request: gtk-unico-engine - Unico Gtk+ theming
engine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Spec URL:
http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-unico-engine/gtk-unico-e...
SRPM URL:
http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-unico-engine/gtk-unico-e...
Description:
Unico is a Gtk+ engine that aims to be the more complete yet powerful theming
engine for Gtk+ 3.0 and newer. It’s the first Gtk+ engine written with Gtk+
style context APIs in mind, using CSS as first class citizen.
Notes:
- build fine in mock
- rpmlint:
gtk-unico-engine.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) theming -> teeming,
hemming, emitting
gtk-unico-engine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US theming ->
teeming, hemming, emitting
gtk-unico-engine.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) theming -> teeming,
hemming, emitting
gtk-unico-engine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US theming ->
teeming, hemming, emitting
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Bug 1047510] New: Review Request: php-opencloud - PHP SDK for OpenStack/Rackspace APIs
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510
Bug ID: 1047510
Summary: Review Request: php-opencloud - PHP SDK for
OpenStack/Rackspace APIs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: gregor(a)freenet.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-opencloud.spec
SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-opencloud-1.6.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: The PHP SDK should work with most OpenStack-based cloud
deployments, though it
specifically targets the Rackspace public cloud. In general, whenever a
Rackspace deployment is substantially different than a pure OpenStack one, a
separate Rackspace subclass is provided so that you can still use the SDK with
a pure OpenStack instance (for example, see the OpenStack class (for OpenStack)
and the Rackspace subclass).
Fedora Account System Username: brummbq
this lib is mainly intended for owncloud 6. For that reason I'm sticking here
to the old release 1.6 until owncloud updates to 1.8 or later. php-opencloud
replaces php-cloudfiles
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
9 years, 6 months
[Bug 692131] Review Request: sflphone - SIP/IAX2 compatible enterprise-class softphone for multi-way conferencing
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692131
Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends On| |1128464
--- Comment #23 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> ---
There is one more missing piece: #1128464
Furthermore, what complicates things is that the kde client now (i.e. >= 1.4.0)
has video support as an integral component (i.e. there is no build-time
configuration flag to switch it off). Video support dependes on ffmpeg, so at
least the kde client would need to go into rpmfusion. The gnome client still
has video support as a compile-time option, however at this point the question
is whether it is not better to just have the full-featured package in
rpmfusion. (I actually tried patching splitting out the video support out of
the kde client, but hit a wall somewhere along the way as far as I remember).
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128464
[Bug 1128464] Update to 0.2.3 (unofficial)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
9 years, 6 months