[Bug 838775] New: Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775
Bug ID: 838775
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Summary: Review Request: ghc-css-text - CSS parser and renderer
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: All
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-css-text/ghc-css-text.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-css-text/ghc-css-text-0.1.1-1.fc18.sr...
Description:
CSS parser and renderer
Fedora Account System Username: mathstuf
% lintmock fedora-rawhide-x86_64
ghc-css-text.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) renderer -> tenderer,
rendered, render er
ghc-css-text.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US renderer -> tenderer,
rendered, render er
ghc-css-text.src: W: strange-permission ghc-css-text.spec 0640L
ghc-css-text.src: W: strange-permission css-text-0.1.1.tar.gz 0640L
ghc-css-text.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) renderer -> tenderer,
rendered, render er
ghc-css-text.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US renderer ->
tenderer, rendered, render er
ghc-css-text-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) renderer ->
tenderer, rendered, render er
ghc-css-text-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US renderer ->
tenderer, rendered, render er
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 8 months
[Bug 879877] New: Review Request: xs-rsync - OLPC XS Rsync publishing
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879877
Bug ID: 879877
Summary: Review Request: xs-rsync - OLPC XS Rsync publishing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: kparmar4(a)myseneca.ca
Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7d3uykgpsffu8ic/xs-rsync.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/g9jfv6epugrjvh0/xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2....
Description: Hi, I have rebuild this package to meet with Packaging guidelines.
I received original package from
http://build.laptop.org.au/xs/XS-0.7+/repos/XS-F17ARM/SRPMS/
I would appreciate a review for this package.
Fedora Account System Username: kparmar4
Output of Fedora-Review Tool:
Package Review
==============
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
[!]: Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
[!]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: make
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[!]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: make
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[ ]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/kparmar4/rpmbuild/SRPMS/review-xs-
rsync/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[!]: Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
[ ]: Package is not relocatable.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[ ]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[x]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[ ]: Files in /run, var/run and /var/lock uses tmpfiles.d when appropriate
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: Mock build failed
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.1.26 starting...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Mock Version: 1.1.26
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.26
Start: lock buildroot
INFO: installing package(s):
/home/kparmar4/rpmbuild/SRPMS/review-xs-rsync/results/xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed:
# ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-17-i386/root/',
'install',
'/home/kparmar4/rpmbuild/SRPMS/review-xs-rsync/results/xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch.rpm',
'--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts']
Error: Package: xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch
(/xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch)
Requires: usbmount
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
Error: Package: xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch
(/xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch)
Requires: xs-tools
Error: Package: xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch
(/xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch)
Requires: xs-config
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.src.rpm
xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch.rpm
xs-rsync.src: W: invalid-url Source0: xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49.tar.bz2
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /library/xs-rsync/state xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /library/xs-rsync/state xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /library/xs-rsync/tmp xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /library/xs-rsync/tmp xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /library/xs-rsync/pub/builds xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /library/xs-rsync/pub/builds xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /library/xs-rsync/pub xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /library/xs-rsync/pub xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/xs-rsync xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/xs-rsync xs-rsync
xs-rsync.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xs-unpack-xobuild
xs-rsync.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xs-publish-xobuild
xs-rsync.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xs-refresh-xobuilds
xs-rsync.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post cp
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings.
Requires
--------
xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/bash
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/python
bash
config(xs-rsync) = 0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17
fakechroot
fakeroot
python
rsync
usbmount
vixie-cron
xinetd
xs-config
xs-tools
xz
xz-lzma-compat
Provides
--------
xs-rsync-0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17.noarch.rpm:
config(xs-rsync) = 0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17
xs-rsync = 0.6.12.gabc8f49-1.0.2.fc17
MD5-sum check
-------------
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (b71abc1) last change: 2012-10-16
Buildroot used: fedora-17-i386
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec --name xs-rsync
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 739323] New: Review Request: mozilla-https-everywhere - HTTPS/HSTS enforcement extension for Mozilla browsers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mozilla-https-everywhere - HTTPS/HSTS enforcement extension for Mozilla browsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739323
Summary: Review Request: mozilla-https-everywhere - HTTPS/HSTS
enforcement extension for Mozilla browsers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: niveusluna(a)niveusluna.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Spec URL: mozilla-https-everywhere.spec
SRPM URL:
https://niveusluna.org/kahiru/repo/fedora/free/SRPMS/mozilla-https-everyw...
Description: I'm just gonna copy and paste this from upstream, if that's okay.
HTTPS Everywhere is a Firefox extension produced as a collaboration between The
Tor Project and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. It encrypts your
communications with a number of major websites.
Many sites on the web offer some limited support for encryption over HTTPS, but
make it difficult to use. For instance, they may default to unencrypted HTTP,
or fill encrypted pages with links that go back to the unencrypted site.
The HTTPS Everywhere extension fixes these problems by rewriting all requests
to these sites to HTTPS.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 9 months