[Bug 747092] New: Review Request: lzma-sdk457 - SDK for lzma compression
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: lzma-sdk457 - SDK for lzma compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747092
Summary: Review Request: lzma-sdk457 - SDK for lzma compression
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Spec URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/lzma-sdk457.spec
SRPM URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/lzma-sdk457-4.57-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
LZMA SDK provides the documentation, samples, header files, libraries,
and tools you need to develop applications that use LZMA compression.
LZMA is default and general compression method of 7z format
in 7-Zip compression program (7-zip.org). LZMA provides high
compression ratio and very fast decompression.
LZMA is an improved version of famous LZ77 compression algorithm.
It was improved in way of maximum increasing of compression ratio,
keeping high decompression speed and low memory requirements for
decompressing.
PACKAGER NOTE:
The LZMA SDK is entirely ABI/API incompatible across multiple releases, and it
is not uncommon for FOSS libraries and applications that wanted or needed LZMA
support to have picked the SDK that was current at the time, written to it,
then embedded a copy of it. There is already a "lzma-sdk" package at version
4.65. This is a package for version 4.57, which is needed by physfs and
physfs2. It does not conflict with the lzma-sdk package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 3 months
[Bug 543689] New: Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543689
Summary: Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for
libibverbs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dledford(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
libipathverbs is a simple package that provides a low level hardware driver for
the libibverbs package. The current package requires libibverbs-1.1.3 or later
to compile, and prebuilt versions as well as the spec file and srpm can be
found on my person web page at:
http://xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/
rpmlint shows the following:
[dledford@firewall Package_Review]$ rpmlint libipathverbs*
libipathverbs.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-provides libibverbs-driver
libipathverbs.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/libibverbs.d/ipath.driver
libipathverbs.spec:11: W: unversioned-explicit-provides libibverbs-driver
libipathverbs-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
[dledford@firewall Package_Review]$
The first and third ones are correct as it's a psuedo provides that only exists
for the purpose of causing a yum install of libibverbs to pull in all the
hardware drivers that make libibverbs operate.
The second is a side effect of the libibverbs package. It requires the file in
this location, but the file is not user changable and should not therefore be
labeled as a conf file.
The final one is because the -static package only has one file, the static
library. All the docs are in the base package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 3 months
[Bug 543685] New: Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543685
Summary: Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dledford(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
libnes is a simple package that provides a low level hardware driver for the
libibverbs package. The current package requires libibverbs-1.1.3 or later to
compile, and prebuilt versions as well as the spec file and srpm can be found
on my person web page at:
http://xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/
rpmlint shows the following:
[dledford@firewall rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/libnes-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/libnes-*
libnes.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides libibverbs-driver
libnes.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/libibverbs.d/nes.driver
libnes-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
The first one is correct as it's a psuedo provides that only exists for the
purpose of causing a yum install of libibverbs to pull in all the hardware
drivers that make libibverbs operate.
The second is a side effect of the libibverbs package. It requires the file in
this location, but the file is not user changable and should not therefore be
labeled as a conf file.
The final one is because the -static package only has one file, the static
library. All the docs are in the base package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 3 months
[Bug 450616] New: opensm package
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616
Summary: opensm package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: noarch
URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dledford(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450483 +++
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450482 +++
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450481 +++
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450470 +++
This is the Open Fabrics Alliance Infiniband Subnet Manager (OpenSM). It's
responsible for assigning a link ID to all members of the fabric, determining
routing via one of several routing algorithms, and other tasks. If you have an
IB fabric with a dumb switch (meaning one without a built in SM, or one where
the SM is turned off), then you must have opensm (or another SM) up and running
on the fabric in order to be able to communicate with other hosts. As such,
this is an essential element of the IB network stack. This package relies upon
the libibumad package this bug was cloned from.
src rpm can be found under
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/
x86_64 rpms can be found under
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/x86_64/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
12 years, 3 months