Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165574
Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steve(a)silug.org
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org> 2010-10-25 12:38:05 EDT ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Params-Validate
New Branches: el6
Owners: steve
InitialCC: perl-sig
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557
Summary: Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and
flexible ORM library for python26
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: wdierkes(a)rackspace.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/python26-sqlalchemy.spec
SRPM URL:
http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/python26-sqlalchemy-0.5.8-4.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
SQLAlchemy is an Object Relational Mappper (ORM) that provides a flexible,
high-level interface to SQL databases. Database and domain concepts are
decoupled, allowing both sides maximum flexibility and power. SQLAlchemy
provides a powerful mapping layer that can work as automatically or as manually
as you choose, determining relationships based on foreign keys or letting you
define the join conditions explicitly, to bridge the gap between database and
domain.
Note: This package is only for EPEL 5, to accompany the python26 set.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165572
Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steve(a)silug.org
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org> 2010-10-25 12:36:34 EDT ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Devel-StackTrace
New Branches: el6
Owners: steve
InitialCC: perl-sig
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: erlang-getopt - Erlang module to parse command line arguments using the GNU getopt syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638948
Summary: Review Request: erlang-getopt - Erlang module to parse
command line arguments using the GNU getopt syntax
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lemenkov(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-getopt.spec
SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-getopt-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: Command-line parsing module that uses a syntax similar to that of
GNU getopt.
This is one of the dependencies for rebar.
Koji scratchbuild for F-14:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2503572
rpmlint messages:
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-getopt-0.3-1.fc12.ppc.rpm
erlang-getopt.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-getopt.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
erlang-getopt.ppc: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/ex1.escript
erlang-getopt.ppc: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/rebar_test.escript
erlang-getopt.ppc: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/ex1.escript /usr/bin/env
erlang-getopt.ppc: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/rebar_test.escript /usr/bin/env
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
The first two messages are common for all erlang packages which are containing
only beam-files (binary loading modules for Erlang VM) - they must be installed
into arch-dependent directory. The rest of messages are about sample scripts. I
have no strong feelings regarding whether they should have 644 or 755 perms.
Feel free to suggest your own variant.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream
file format library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kraxel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL:
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libogg/mingw32-libogg.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libogg/mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-1…
Description:
Libogg is a library for manipulating Ogg bitstream file formats.
Libogg supports both making Ogg bitstreams and getting packets from
Ogg bitstreams.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the
libogg bitstream library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mihai(a)limbasan.ro
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://rpms.limbasan.ro/fedora/11/SPECS/mingw32-libogg.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rpms.limbasan.ro/fedora/11/SRMPS/mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-2.fc11.src.rpm
Description: This is MinGW crosscompiler port of libogg.
The spec file was created based on the example at
http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/3d9d4c…
and on the main Fedora libogg spec, taking into account the MinGW SIG packaging
guildelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW .
rpmlint output:
[mimock@home syncup]$ rpmlint mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm
mingw32-libogg-1.1.4-2.fc11.src.rpm
mingw32-libogg-static-1.1.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm
mingw32-libogg-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libogg.a
mingw32-libogg-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
which are OK accoring to the packaging guidelines.
Since there is no current mingw32-libogg package I decided to go for the latest
upstream version, 1.1.4, instead of Fedora's 1.1.3.
The -m4 patch is Fedora's -m4 patch, corrected to apply cleanly on 1.1.4.
The -acconf patch helps in replacing the ancient config.sub, config.guess, and
libtool shipped by upstream with current versions.
The main deviation from Fedora's build step is using sed instead of perl to
replace upstream's (slightly insane) CFLAGS.
Here's my ~/.rpmmacros so far:
%_topdir %(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild
%__arch_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
%_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
%_smp_mflags -j3
%packager Mihai Limbasan <mihai(a)limbasan.ro>
... hope this is OK - this is my first package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: wicd - Wireless and wired network connection manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841
Summary: Review Request: wicd - Wireless and wired network
connection manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dcantrell(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/wicd/wicd.spec
SRPM URL: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/wicd/wicd-1.7.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:
Wicd is designed to give the user as much control over behavior of network
connections as possible. Every network, both wired and wireless, has its
own profile with its own configuration options and connection behavior.
Wicd will try to automatically connect only to networks the user specifies
it should try, with a preference first to a wired network, then to wireless.
Purpose:
Wicd is an alternative to NetworkManager for people who want something like
NetworkManager, but not requiring GNOME. It is gaining popularity among
non-GNOME users simply because it has multiple clients as opposed to requiring
nm-applet for everything. Wicd is written in Python and provides a daemon and
three clients (cli, curses, gtk). It is not as full-featured as
NetworkManager, but for most people it fits the bill. Especially users wanted
to slim down a system or just not run GNOME.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: goobook - Abook-style interface for google contacts for mutt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607016
Summary: Review Request: goobook - Abook-style interface for
google contacts for mutt
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mrlhwliberty(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/goobook.spec
SRPM URL:
http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/goobook-1.3-0.1.a1.fc13.noarch.rpm
Description:
Command-line interface to Google contacts. It includes
* Searching contacts
* Mutt integration (the same way as for abook)
* Adding new contacts (very basic)
Goobook depend on hcs_utils. I have made another package. I hope reviewers can
review these two packages together.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607015
Note python-simplejson > 2.1.0 is needed. It is here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=179069
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.