[Bug 533094] New: Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533094
Summary: Review Request: xskat - The card game Skat
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: chkr(a)plauener.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat.spec
SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/xskat-4.0.0-1.src.rpm
Description:
XSkat lets you play the card game Skat as defined by the official Skat Order.
Features:
* Single- and multiplayer mode
* Playing over LAN or IRC
* Game lists and logs
* Three types of scoring
* English or German text
* German or French suited cards
* Selectable computer playing strength
* Pre-definable card distributions
* Variations: Ramsch, Bock, Kontra & Re, ...
Please note that rpmlint's complaint about the license is a false positive -
the license was recently reviewed on the fedora-legal-list and added to the
acceptable licenses of Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/XSkat_License
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 6 months
[Bug 527241] New: Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241
Summary: Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: qdlacz(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm.spec
SRPM URL: http://krnowak.fedorapeople.org/libvtemm12-0.22.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: libvtemm provides a C++ interface to the VTE library.
spec file is based on gtkmm.spec from
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gtkmm24/devel/gtkmm.spec?revisio...
(this is last revision).
package builds on koji on all architectures.
rpmlint output on spec (libvtemm.spec):
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint output on srpm (libvtemm12-0.22.0-1.fc11.src.rpm):
libvtemm12.src: E: invalid-spec-name
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
Same error is displayed while checking gtkmm24 srpm. Should package be named
just libvtemm or spec renamed to libvtemm12 - its API version is 1.2. I left it
in this state just to be consistent with other *mm packages (gtkmm24,
glibmm24).
rpmlint output on main package (libvtemm12-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm):
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint output on debuginfo package
(libvtemm12-debuginfo-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm):
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint output on devel package (libvtemm12-devel-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm):
libvtemm12-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
I put all not installed documentation (AUTHORS, NEWS, ChangeLog and such) in
main package. API docs are in separate package. Maybe in later upstream release
of libvtemm example source codes will be distributed, so they would be put into
documentation of devel package.
rpmlint output on docs package (libvtemm12-docs-0.22.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm):
libvtemm12-docs.i686: E: devel-dependency libvtemm12-devel
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
Having API docs without devel package does not make much sense.
I only was wondering if moving whole API documentation to gtk-doc directory is
really necessary since recently mm packages provide their own .devhelp files,
so html documentation could reside in docdir being still viewable by devhelp.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 6 months
[Bug 512523] New: Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523
Summary: Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based
Authentication Program and Screen Locker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dmaphy(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem.spec
SRPM URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm
488dec198225b456be8be0f49b73aeb3 graphem.spec
b745310586d239a50c7f23679c3694be graphem-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: Graphem is a small mouse gesture based authentication program and
screen locker program. It stores key patterns in hashed form; can lock the
display until the correct pattern is entered; can control login via scripting,
e.g. with GDM using auto-login and a PostLogin script; it supports a Touchpad
mode for notebook users which allows graphem to accept input without clicking;
it keeps track of recognition rate
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 6 months