[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
Lee Howard <faxguy(a)howardsilvan.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jskala(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #102 from Lee Howard <faxguy(a)howardsilvan.com> 2009-10-14 17:08:39 EDT ---
Jason,
This is a very long-winded bug report. So let me be clear about issues you
bring up.
I am VERY happy to change the name of the package to "hylafax+" if that will
get it into Fedora. (Understand, that a package name change will cause me no
small amount of support effort for the very large existing installation base.
See other notes describing inadequacies within RPM for dealing with it.)
So, if I change the name of the package to "hylafax+" will you be able to help
it get into Fedora? (I want to ensure that my effort in doing so actually
results in something.)
As for the alternatives suggestion, I'm completely happy to work with
jskala(a)redhat.com who I have now CC'ed on this report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
AssignedTo|tibbs(a)math.uh.edu |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Flag|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #101 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2009-10-14 15:51:04 EDT ---
As far as I can tell, that's not even the same hylafax. Which underpins the
reason why this package will never be approved (by me, at least) without being
renamed to hylafax+ as has been repeatly requested in this ticket. Since
comment #83 indicates that this won't happen, I don't even know why I still
have this ticket assigned to myself.
So I'm just unassigning myself and returning this to the review queue. As I do
that, I'll make a few notes:
The package in comment #99 still builds OK in today's rawhide and rpmlint
really doesn't complain about much. In fact, I'll just post it here:
hylafax.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax
hylafax.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax
hylafax.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.2.9
HYLAFAX_VERSION_STRING
hylafax.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.2.9 /lib64/libm.so.6
hylafax.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libfaxutil.so.5.2.9 /lib64/libm.so.6
The first two and last two are not problematic; I'm not really sure about the
third one. It was indicated that this should be easy to fix, but I can't
suggest how to fix it.
The Conflicts: with mgetty-sendfax is problematic according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts. I'd say that the best way
out is to use alternatives as recommended by those guidelines, which requires
coordination with the owner of the mgetty package (jskala(a)redhat.com) who
should probably be added as a CC if this starts moving forward again.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Bug 523553] New: Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553
Summary: Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lpoetter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace.spec
SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: Mutex Tracer
mutracer is a mutex tracer/profiler. The package should be easy to review.
See this for more information:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/mutrace.html
If you run this through rpmlint you'll get invalid-soname and
shared-lib-calls-exit warnings. Both are safe to be ignored.
The former is expected since this is not a library applications are supposed to
link to, it's intended only for LD_PRELOAD. This is similar to libpulsedsp.so.
The latter too is expected since we actually hook into the different variations
of exit() to print our statistics summary. After printing that we call the real
implementations of those calls.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months