[Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054
--- Comment #21 from Stefan Ruppert <stefan.ruppert(a)myarm.de> 2008-12-02 03:03:39 EDT ---
I'm the author of some parts of the ARM4SDK but I'm not the copyright owner.
Also it seems that the ARM4SDK development is dead since 2003 or 2004.
In the meanwhile I have founded my own company MyARM. And we at MyARM would
also prefer to see the ARM4SDK license changed to a free license. I can write
an email regarding ARM4SDK license change to the people how were involved in
the development of the ARM4SDK at that time!
David, you are right release delay of the ARM4SDK was about licensing issues.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 250282] Package request/suggestion: kidled
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250282
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-package-review@redha
| |t.com, notting(a)redhat.com
Component|distribution |Package Review
AssignedTo|notting(a)redhat.com |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact|notting(a)redhat.com |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054
--- Comment #20 from David Carter <dcarter(a)entertain-me.com> 2008-12-01 17:50:19 EDT ---
The legal opinion is in. Looks like I'll have to some modification.
>From Tom Callaway:
"Unfortunately, it isn't okay.
This is non-free, because there is no permission to redistribute
modified versions of code under this license, only to "Make copies of
the original file you download and distribute it". That, combined with:
"Except as expressly stated above, HP and tang-IT grant no other
licenses, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any
intellectual property rights." means that we cannot assume permission to
distribute modified/derived works is implied.
HP usually does a better job of this, perhaps they'd be willing to fix
this license, or re-license this work under an established free license?"
Stefan, any comments on the last paragraph? I know licensing held up the
initial SDK release
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 428250] New: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250
Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: marc(a)mwiriadi.id.au
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview.spec
SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview-0.1.7-1.fc8.s...
Description:
Gpicview is an image viewer that is:
Extremely lightweight and fast with low memory usage
Very suitable for default image viewer of desktop system
Simple and intuitive interface
Minimal lib dependency: Only pure GTK+ is used
Desktop independent: Doesn't require any specific desktop environment
RPM Lint:
On RPM file
[marc@Strike-Lap i386]$ rpmlint gpicview-0.1.7-1.fc8.i386.rpm
gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/README
gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/NEWS
gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/TODO
gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/ChangeLog
gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo
gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo
gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo
gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo
gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo
gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo
gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo
On SRPM:
Nothing
Only issue I have thats severe is the *.mo files and I'm not to sure how to fix it. I can compile it in F-8 yet mock building it in devel doesn't build claiming that the *mo files do not exist.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 4 months