[Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318
manuel wolfshant <wolfy(a)nobugconsulting.ro> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #36 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy(a)nobugconsulting.ro> 2008-12-12 10:09:09 EDT ---
restoring NEW as status, according to its history no one has ever formally
decided to review the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #46 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2008-12-11 19:41:21 EDT ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-RPM2
New Branches: F-10
Note: This was declared dead due to incompatibility with RPM 4.6 before F-10
branching took place. It had been resurrected in CVS devel and patched for RPM
4.6 now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925
--- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert <fedora(a)christoph-wickert.de> 2008-12-11 14:23:06 EDT ---
I think there is something that needs to fixed in the spec:
> Patch0: %{name}-%{version}-gfx.patch
> Patch1: %{name}-%{version}-snd.patch
> Patch2: %{name}-%{version}-save.patch
> Patch3: %{name}-%{version}-optflags.patch
This does not work, because during an update you will have to rename all the
patches. This also means removing and re-adding them from/to cvs. If the names
of the patches are changed one does not get the diff in the commit.
So it needs to be:
Patch0: %{name}-1.2-gfx.patch
...
The version in the patch name is always the version where the patch was added
but not the version of the package itself.
> Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
This should IMO be removed. Without the icon-theme there is no icon in the
desktop file, but this does no real harm. hicolor-icon-theme is installed as
soon as gtk2 gets installed. In the very unlikely case that somebody really
does not have gtk2, he most likely doesn't have a menu ether or at least not
menu that shows icons (think of openbox or fluxbox for example).
Nevertheless none of these issues is really important enough to justify an
update, fixing in CVS is sufficient.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months