[Bug 452901] New: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901
Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pm(a)datasphere.ch
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd-1.5.1-rc1.2.fc8.src.rpm
Description: The ocspd is an RFC2560 compliant OCSPD responder. It can be used to verify the status of a certificate using OCSP clients (such as Mozilla/Firefox/Thunderbird/Apache). It is CRL-based, and is able to fetch CRLs from files, LDAP or HTTP.
This product is under the OpenCA license, which is Apache-like: should be Fedora-compatible.
OpenCA releases an RPM (openca-ocspd) used as starting point for the current one. The license paragraph has not been changed, resulting in an rpmlint error.
Needs also a system-user named "ocspd" for the daemon.
This is my first package and I need a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-10-13 02:29:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I still don't understand why the package is being named 69oldstandard-fonts??
> Is the correct name oldstandard-fonts?
The correct upstream name is Old Standard
However upstream has asked us to rename if we rebuilt from sfds
I guess 69oldstandard is as good as any renaming (though I'd have used
69-old-standard-fonts)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 466394] New: Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394
Summary: Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF
renderer and viewer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: orcanbahri(a)yahoo.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer-0-1.20081005cvs.fc10.src...
Description:
The PDF Renderer is just what the name implies: an open source,
all Java library which renders PDF documents to the screen using
Java2D. Typically this means drawing into a Swing panel, but it
could also draw to other Graphics2D implementations. It could be
used to draw on top of PDFs, share them over a network, convert
PDFs to PNG images, or maybe even project PDFs into a 3D scene.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
rpmlint gives a false warning on the SRPM:
pdf-renderer.src:99: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
which can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 207796] New: Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207796
Summary: Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL:
ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/eventlog.spec
SRPM URL:
ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/eventlog-0.2.5-1.src.rpm
Description:
The EventLog library aims to be a replacement of the simple syslog() API
provided on UNIX systems. The major difference between EventLog and syslog
is that EventLog tries to add structure to messages.
EventLog provides an interface to build, format and output an event record.
The exact format and output method can be customized by the administrator
via a configuration file.
Notes:
* This package is a syslog-ng v2 build requirement (static library)
A syslog-ng v2 test srpm is available at the above download directory
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
15 years, 8 months