Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Summary: Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync.spec
SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: Zsync is a file transfer program to download files from remote web servers. If a previous version of a file is available locally, zsync will only download changed parts and hereby minimise the download volume. The algorithm is the same as used by rsync, but zsync does not require any server software (apart from a web server), nor does it need shell access. Instead, it uses a control file (.zsync file) that describes the file to be downloaded, which it uses to determine the blocks to fetch. This file is created once on the server (and not for each request) and sits next to actual file to download
RPMLINT: silent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-03-13 10:42:53 EDT --- A review request already exists for this package. Closing as duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 478617 ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Robert Scheck redhat@linuxnetz.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d | |e Resolution|DUPLICATE | AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d | |e
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck redhat@linuxnetz.de 2009-04-10 18:06:31 EDT --- https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134 has to be solved/approved first.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Simon Wesp cassmodiah@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |495310
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Simon Wesp cassmodiah@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|495310 |504493
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Juha Tuomala tuju@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuju@iki.fi Alias| |zsync
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504493 Depends on|504493 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
--- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp cassmodiah@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-15 12:57:32 EDT --- Update to 0.6.1
SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
Still the internal zlib problem!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-13 21:42:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364673) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364673) zsync-0.6.1-nozlib.patch
Patching out the internal zlib and zsync still worksforme.
This patch could be improved with sufficient autofoo to just just touch Makefile.am (and maybe also remove zlib/Makefile.in from configure.ac, but I ran into so nasty auto nonsense so stopped here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #364673|0 |1 is obsolete| |
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-14 02:09:11 EDT --- (From update of attachment 364673) Sorry I was not testing properly this doesn't build - got fooled by a hardlink moved by emacs... ;-(
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-10-20 06:22:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365321) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365321) patch to use zlib from forked from rsync
the patch is not tested, just a proof-of-concept
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
--- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.de 2009-10-20 15:17:28 EDT --- According to bug #495310 comment #15, that won't work.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-11-09 03:07:59 EDT --- *** Bug 533778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian@bernewireless.net
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-02 13:54:25 EDT --- *** Bug 478617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |495310
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Thom Carlin bugzilla.acct@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.acct@gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de)
--- Comment #10 from Thom Carlin bugzilla.acct@gmail.com 2011-02-22 13:09:32 EST --- Hey Robert, any updates on this bug?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Robert Scheck redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de) |
--- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.de 2011-02-23 16:40:07 EST --- I'm not aware, that anything changed or improved so far...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Thom Carlin bugzilla.acct@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de)
--- Comment #12 from Thom Carlin bugzilla.acct@gmail.com 2011-03-14 15:41:58 EDT --- Any updates?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de) |
--- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-14 16:32:26 EDT --- There is no use requesting info from Robert. If you read this bug carefully you will see that bug 504493 is blocking this one. If you want to advance there, please bring this up to FESCo or the Fedora packaging committee.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org