https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Bug ID: 1757256 Summary: Review Request: vim-airline - Lean & mean status/tabline for vim that's light as air Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.cordatus@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x... SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x...
Description: Lean & mean status/tabline for vim that's light as air.
Fedora Account System Username: atim
Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/vim-airline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quantum.analyst@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- Requires: vim-enhanced + Suggests: neovim is a bit weird. If you use neovim, why would you want vim-enhanced installed too? But also, I'm not sure that neovim uses files in %{vimfiles_root}.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #2 from Artem ego.cordatus@gmail.com --- Not sure about neovim too. :) This and this[1] my first Vim packages so appreciate any help and suggestions. I'll remove neovim from Suggests... TY.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757225
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #3 from Artem ego.cordatus@gmail.com --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x...
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vondruch@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com --- @Artem I would be nice if you included AppData [1, 2] so the plugin appears in Gnome Software.
[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/ [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vim-nerdtree/blob/master/f/vim-nerdtree.s...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #5 from Artem ego.cordatus@gmail.com --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x...
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x...
I would be nice if you included AppData [1, 2] so the plugin appears in Gnome Software.
That's awesome. I didn't know that GNOME Software shows addons for Gvim. :) It would be nice if you help me and review next Vim plugins which i plan to push in repos. TY.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zebob.m@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zebob.m@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com --- - Please validate the Appdata file:
BuildRequires: libappstream-glib
[…]
appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}%{_metainfodir}/*.metainfo.xml
- Validation will fail:
+ appstream-util validate-relax --nonet /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/vim-airline-0.10-4.20191011git297ca3d.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/metainfo/vim-airline.metainfo.xml /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/vim-airline-0.10-4.20191011git297ca3d.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/metainfo/vim-airline.metainfo.xml: failed to parse /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/vim-airline-0.10-4.20191011git297ca3d.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/metainfo/vim-airline.metainfo.xml: Error on line 7: Entity did not end with a semicolon; most likely you used an ampersand character without intending to start an entity ? escape ampersand as &
→ Convert your & into &
Note that Neovim doesn't use %{vimfiles_root} to search its plugins, to do so it needs to be configured that way.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 94 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/vim-airline/review-vim- airline/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 112640 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: vim-airline-0.10-4.20191011git297ca3d.fc32.noarch.rpm vim-airline-0.10-4.20191011git297ca3d.fc32.src.rpm vim-airline.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US statusline -> status line, status-line, stateliness vim-airline.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tabline -> tabling, tab line, tab-line vim-airline.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tabline -> tabling, tab line, tab-line vim-airline.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US statusline -> status line, status-line, stateliness vim-airline.src: W: no-%build-section 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #7 from Artem ego.cordatus@gmail.com --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x...
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-31-x...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com --- Package approved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla gwync@protonmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vim-airline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2019-13bc5d68a8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-13bc5d68a8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2019-1ada3baef1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1ada3baef1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-6a478c3c36 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-6a478c3c36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- vim-airline-0.10-5.20191011git297ca3d.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-13bc5d68a8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- vim-airline-0.10-5.20191011git297ca3d.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1ada3baef1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- vim-airline-0.10-5.20191011git297ca3d.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-6a478c3c36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2019-10-25 17:00:25
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- vim-airline-0.10-5.20191011git297ca3d.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- vim-airline-0.10-5.20191011git297ca3d.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- vim-airline-0.10-5.20191011git297ca3d.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org