https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
Bug ID: 826701 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: hibernate-tools - Hibernate tools Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: puntogil@libero.it Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools-3.2.4-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Forward- and reverse-engineering tools for Eclipse and Ant. Fedora Account System Username: gil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |652183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
Marek Goldmann mgoldman@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgoldman@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann mgoldman@redhat.com --- The proper upstream URL for source is: https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-tools
Which part of Hibernate 4 requires this library?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- hi see https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/blob/4.1.4.Final/hibernate-envers... regards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |828223
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/hibernate-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/hibernate-tools-3.5.0-1.fc16.src... - update to 3.5.0.Alpha-SNAPSHOT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
--- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgoldman@redhat.com --- What's the reason to go to alpha?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
--- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann mgoldman@redhat.com --- Ah, ok, the repo is missing tags.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |847496
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/3.6.0/hibernate-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/3.6.0/hibernate-tools-3.6.0-0.1.... - update to 3.6.0-SNAPSHOT
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4380421
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|847496 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
--- Comment #7 from Marek Goldmann mgoldman@redhat.com --- Some information about versioning of Hibernate Tools.
Old SVN repository should not be used.
On GitHub there are 3 branches:
- 3.4.x - supoprt for hibernate-core 3.3-3.5 - 3.6.x - support for hibernate-core 3.6 - master - support for hibernate-core 4
These 3 versions have different API's and most probably we'll need to package two or all of them.
There are no tags at this moment, it should be fixed in the future.
Some more info about why we need to have available multiple versions of these libraries. Since we have hibernate3 package and hibernate (4) in plans I thought about having two packages available in Fedora:
1. 3.6.x (hibernate-tools36 package) branch and 2. master (hibernate-tools package) branch
But it seems that the 3.4.x branch also needs to be packaged, because the some main code in Hibernate Tools requires it and we would end up in some incompatibility issues:
12:32 <@maxandersen> mgoldmann: when you create a project in eclipse it has some metadata in the .settings folder. 12:33 <@maxandersen> mgoldmann: if you share this with another team member (you often do to avoid reconfigure projects) they will not load/behave differently. 12:33 <@maxandersen> mgoldmann: and if you don't do that - there is the mechanism that uses mvn to let its pom.xml configure your project based on pom.xml and this would also be a bit funky if 3.5 is "nothere"
(there is a typo above and 3.5 should be read 3.4)
If this package is not immediately needed, I would postpone it and get back to it once it'll be a hard stop for someone. In the meantime we can find a solution to satisfy all requirements. If any.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
Michael Scherer misc@zarb.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |misc@zarb.org Whiteboard| |NotReady
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/4.0.0/hibernate-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/hibernate-tools/4.0.0/hibernate-tools-4.0.0-0.1....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mizdebsk@redhat.com, | |puntogil@libero.it Flags| |needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i | |t)
--- Comment #9 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com --- Package is marked as not ready. Is this intentional? If so, can we remove block on FE-JAVASIG?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i | |t) |
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #9)
Package is marked as not ready. Is this intentional?
should ask to Marek before ... If so, can we remove
block on FE-JAVASIG?
yes sure, thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--- Comment #11 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com --- OK, I've removed block on FE-JAVASIG. Feel free to re-add it once package is ready.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826701
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2015-10-21 12:47:46
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- No more interested to maintains this package
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org