Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293
--- Comment #7 from Praveen K Paladugu praveen_paladugu@dell.com 2009-08-05 00:44:51 EDT --- Is there a way to also consider sblim-sfcb also as a possible CIMOM instead of only considering tog-pegasus?
It was discussed before at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183#c10, wouldn't it be better to have Requires:cim-server/cimserver instead of tog-pegasus. This allows sblim-sfcb also to be a possible CIMOM.
Since the sblim-sfcb package already has "Provides:cim-server", it is better we leverage that in this package.
But I am concerned about the "BuildRequires" and also about mentioning the right devel packages in "BuildRequires" and "Requries".
Any suggestions??