Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716384
--- Comment #2 from Adam Huffman bloch@verdurin.com 2011-06-30 17:56:27 EDT --- Just a quick comment - the line "Licenced under the GNU General Public License 2.0 license." in some of the source files is why I put the license as GPLv2. There should really be a file to confirm this, though, I agree. I'll contact upstream.
Re. the BuildRoot and %clean parts - I intend to support this in EPEL5, for which I believe those are still required.
I'll look into the other issues, including the bundled library.