https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038591
Igor Raits igor.raits@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(igor.raits@gmail. | |com) |
--- Comment #7 from Igor Raits igor.raits@gmail.com --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #4)
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #3)
Are you licensing this under GPLv3+, because that's the license of the ansible package? I think it can also be argued that this is MIT, because that's Fedora's implicit license. You might want to check with Igor Raits, the original author of the macros/generators[1], about the licensing. Honestly, I think it's problematic that Fedora relies on implicit licenses while still recommending that upstream ships explicit license files, but I don't know the full context surrounding this decision.
He contributed those and did not add a "and MIT" or note that they were MIT, so I thought it was pretty clear that he wanted them to be contributed under GPLv3+ like ansible. I agree we can confirm with him tho...
Easy enough to check... Igor, do you want these MIT licensed instead or GPLv3+ as Ansible does?
I'm fine with either :)