https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #37 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net ---
Hm. I think that would work for cpp/qt developers too.
Of course. "BuildRequires: qbs" would not be sufficient in that case.
$ qbs No build graph exists yet for this configuration. Resolving project for configuration gcc-debug ERROR: /home/ms20b/tests/qbs/release.qbs:3:1 Product dependency 'cpp' not found.
After installing qbs-cpp:
$ qbs No build graph exists yet for this configuration. Resolving project for configuration gcc-debug ERROR: /usr/share/qbs/modules/cpp/GenericGCC.qbs:7:8 Can't find imported file /usr/share/qbs/modules/cpp/path-tools.js.
Indeed. That file is not packaged, but available in the source tarball. A bug?
Extracting that script from the tarball and installing it, I got this:
$ qbs No build graph exists yet for this configuration. Resolving project for configuration gcc-debug ERROR: /usr/share/qbs/imports/qbs/base/CppApplication.qbs:4:5 Module cpp could not be loaded.
-> More runtime testing of these "qbs" packages is needed.
[...]
Another packaging issue:
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/qbs/* qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch qbs-1.2.1-2.fc20.x86_64 qbs-doc-1.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
The reason is that as of Fedora 20 you cannot use %doc and %_docdir/%name, since the former includes everything below %_docdir/%name (aka the unversioned docdirs feature of F20): https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338