Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781
--- Comment #28 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski rpm@greysector.net 2009-01-20 16:31:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27)
(In reply to comment #26) [...]
strip --strip-unneeded $SOFILE
Calling strip from the specfile is not allowed. rpm post-build scripts do that while building the debuginfo package.
Although in this case they seem to fail. If I remove that strip call, I get: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package flexdock.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/flexdock/libRubberBand-0.so
Actually it's simple. Just don't chmod the .so to 644. It has to be executable for rpmbuild debuginfo scripts to find it. rpmlint is silent afterwards.
Some more nitpicks:
You don't need mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/share
There's still trailing whitespace in the following lines: Name: flexdock
# This patch is fedora specific -- System.loadLibrary fix to help locate JNI components
#Licence is MIT on their website, Apache in their LICENSE.txt
patch3: flexdock-skinlfTitlebarui-path.patch patch4: flexdock-skinlfPainter-path.patch
BuildRequires: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel
Requires: libX11 >= 1.1.4
JDK_DIR=`echo %{_jdkdir} | sed 's!/$!!'`.`uname -m`
echo "Relying on spec file buildpath: $JDK_DIR " >> tmpLog echo "sdk.home=$JDK_DIR" > workingcopy.properties
# https://skinlf.dev.java.net/
ant -Dbuild.sysclasspath=first build.with.native jar