https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042043
--- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga mattia.verga@protonmail.com --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2)
The main question that comes to my mind here is: if INDI declares those libraries as "3rdparty", why are you using INDI as the upstream here? Are the original upstream projects dead? Does INDI require non-upstream modifications to the libraries?
Not sure about that. I suppose INDI provides the libraries to assure compatibility with the drivers it provides. Besides of that, both libindi and libfli (the only two libraries included here) upstreams seem long time dead (the core code seems not touched since years). Also Debian folks use INDI 3rdparty as upstream.