The Debian folks I've talked to feel that the runtime usually needs
about 6 months to stabilize after releases, so Ismael's recommendation
may be wise.
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 19:07 +0100, Ismael Olea wrote:
I vote for an stable f12 with 2.4 and a bleeding edge 2.6 in f13
> El 20 de ene de 2010, 6:02 p.m., "Christopher Brown"
> <snecklifter(a)gmail.com> escribió:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> 2010/1/19 Paul Lange <palango(a)gmx.de>:
>
>
> > Hey, > > after the latest update to Mono 2.4.3.1 I would like to
> ask if it's > planned to update M...
>
> This was mooted but currently its not high up on the agenda.
>
>
> > I would really appreciate this because I think that Mono 2.6
> brings some > great new features and...
>
> Mono 2.6 is a big jump and would involve much rebuilding. Currently
> people simply don't have the time to do this.
>
> I'm also very much against updating Mono in F-12 as the current
> stack
> is stable - I think we have struck the right balance here and as the
> next release will carry 2.6 and is only a few months away, this is
> my
> preference. If you wish to use mono 2.6 you are welcome to grab a
> build from koji or rawhide.
>
>
> > However I've no idea how much work and testing this step would
> need.
>
> Lots!
>
>
> > What do you you think?
>
> See above
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Christopher Brown
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mono mailing list
> mono(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https...
>
_______________________________________________
mono mailing list
mono(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mono