28 Feb
2012
28 Feb
'12
4:58 a.m.
I'm thinking about packaging python-virtualenvwrapper for use with moksha 2.0. It has a permissive but non-standard license:
http://www.doughellmann.com/projects/virtualenvwrapper/#license
Is this compatible with Fedora guidelines? If so, what should I use for the License: field?
-RJ
28 Feb
28 Feb
4:14 p.m.
"RB" == RJ Bean rbean@redhat.com writes:
RB> I'm thinking about packaging python-virtualenvwrapper for use with RB> moksha 2.0. It has a permissive but non-standard license:
Is this not pretty much word-for-word https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#CMU_Style ?
- J<
4665
Age (days ago)
4665
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jason L Tibbitts III -
Ralph Bean