https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304
Bug ID: 973304 Summary: javapackages-tools: fail build if there is a subpackage with pom file but no depmap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: javapackages-tools Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: sochotni@redhat.com Reporter: sochotni@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org, mizdebsk@redhat.com, msrb@redhat.com, sochotni@redhat.com, tradej@redhat.com
javapackages-tools should fail build if there is a subpackage with pom file but no depmap. This would catch problems with wrong depmap file placement early on for most common cases.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature Doc Type|Bug Fix |Enhancement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|sochotni@redhat.com |mizdebsk@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|mizdebsk@redhat.com |msrb@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |NeedsTestCase
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2014-12-14 16:16:51
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com --- IMO it's not important to implement this feature any longer. Nowdays installation of POMs and metadata is handled by .mfiles and therefore it is much less likely to have them installed incorrectly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973304
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|NeedsTestCase |
java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org