https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015123
--- Comment #4 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #3)
(In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #2)
> Created attachment 841063 [details]
> maven-release-ftbfs.patch
>
> This one should be better, and theoretically should not
> change behaviour from when it was building... It basically
> should defers type cast error to runtime, but I did not
> add exception handling in case there are failures.
The second patch looks OK. I am not maintainer of maven-release and I have
limited time, so it would be very helpful if you could follow rule described
in [1] when preparing a patch.
I will try to make a proper patch, but for now I am just using
%if 0%{?fedora}
%else
<<stuff I need different from fedora spec>>>
%endif
But I do not care of having credit for the patch, just showing
what I am using right now, and attempting to have an idea if it
would be usable :-)
> Well, I am just trying to "bootstrap" a java stack
based on
> Fedora packages on another distribution...
Out of curiosity, which distro?
OpenMandriva. Right now I am almost at the point of building
tomcat from sources. But the java stack is a mess of cyclic
dependencies... I did create a javapackages-bootstrap huge
package to inject (most) dependencies in the repositories:
https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/javapackages-bootstrap/blob/master/...
and a few other packages were injected using a noarch rpm as source
to break other cyclic deps found later...
Also feel free to join #java-devel on Freenode. Asking questions
there
usually will be much easier than reporting bugs. We have regular visitors
from other distros there too.
Is it really #java-devel on Freenode? I found myself alone there,
so I left the room :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vRSkZRcpHa&a=cc_unsubscribe