[Bug 1421809] New: Base Runtime FTBFS: pdfbox-1.8.12-4.fc26
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421809
Bug ID: 1421809
Summary: Base Runtime FTBFS: pdfbox-1.8.12-4.fc26
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: pdfbox
Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it
Reporter: mmathesi(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
orion(a)cora.nwra.com, psabata(a)redhat.com,
puntogil(a)libero.it, sgallagh(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 1400162 (BaseRuntimeFTBFS)
Description of problem:
When attempting to rebuild portions of the frozen package set of Fedora 25 for
the Base Runtime effort, we discovered that pdfbox fails to build from source
due to a failing self-test. This issue also manifests itself in both Fedora 25
and Rawhide .
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pdfbox-1.8.12-4.fc26
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce (rawhide):
1. fedpkg clone pdfbox
2. cd pdfbox
3. fedpkg switch-branch master
4. fedpkg mockbuild
Actual results:
Results :
Failed tests:
TestSynchronizedMetadataValidation.testAllInfoSynhcronized:422 expected:<0>
but was:<2>
TestSynchronizedMetadataValidation.testBadPrefixSchemas:499
expected:<7.[4.]2> but was:<7.[]2>
TestSynchronizedMetadataValidation.testdoublePrefixSchemas:572
Tests run: 72, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Skipping PDFBox reactor
[INFO] This project has been banned from the build due to previous failures.
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] PDFBox parent ...................................... SUCCESS [ 0.350 s]
[INFO] Apache FontBox ..................................... SUCCESS [ 4.566 s]
[INFO] Apache JempBox ..................................... SUCCESS [ 1.155 s]
[INFO] Apache XmpBox ...................................... SUCCESS [ 2.631 s]
[INFO] Apache PDFBox ...................................... SUCCESS [ 22.237 s]
[INFO] Apache Preflight ................................... FAILURE [ 3.093 s]
[INFO] Apache PDFBox for Ant .............................. SKIPPED
[INFO] Apache PDFBox examples ............................. SKIPPED
[INFO] PDFBox reactor ..................................... SKIPPED
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected results:
Successful build of the package.
Additional info:
This is needed as part of the Base Runtime effort.
Attached is a patch that applies upstream patches to fix the failing self-test.
Please apply the patch or respond with a reason it should not be applied within
two weeks. After that time, a provenpackager will go ahead and apply it.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400162
[Bug 1400162] Base Runtime FTBFS tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 1421807] New: Disable unreliable test
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421807
Bug ID: 1421807
Summary: Disable unreliable test
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: jackcess
Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it
Reporter: sgallagh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
puntogil(a)libero.it
Created attachment 1249979
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1249979&action=edit
Patch to remove test with unreliable results
Description of problem:
In Jackcess 2.1.3, there is an "ancient dates" test. In the current specfile,
this is hacked up to provide a different set of "expected" results. However,
while that hack appears to work against F25 and Rawhide, it fails under some
other mock builds, depending on what packages happen to be in the buildroot. In
the case of the Base Runtime build, it fails because it gets back the exact
results the upstream test is expecting.
Given that this test is clearly unreliable, I'm providing a patch to skip this
one to avoid it causing a FTBFS on modular builds. Please either apply this
patch to dist-git within two weeks or provide a reason not to do so.
If you also decide to do a rebase to the latest upstream release, please apply
this patch as a separate commit *first*. That way, we can reference that git
hash when performing our modular build.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
jackcess-2.1.3-3.fc25
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Build jackcess-2.1.3-4.fc25 in the module build service[1]
Actual results:
Tests run: 26, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.841 sec <<<
FAILURE! - in com.healthmarketscience.jackcess.DatabaseTest
testAncientDates(com.healthmarketscience.jackcess.DatabaseTest) Time elapsed:
0.021 sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<[1582-10-14, 1582-10-13,
1492-01-09, 1392-01-09]> but was:<[1582-10-15, 1582-10-14, 1492-01-10,
1392-01-10]>
at
com.healthmarketscience.jackcess.DatabaseTest.testAncientDates(DatabaseTest.java:728)
Expected results:
All tests should pass.
Additional info:
[1] Alternately, here is a mock config that can be run locally:
config_opts['root'] = 'fedora-25-base-runtime'
config_opts['target_arch'] = 'x86_64'
config_opts['legal_host_arches'] = ('x86_64',)
config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'install bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils
fedora-release findutils gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip info make patch
redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux which xz'
config_opts['dist'] = '' # only useful for --resultdir variable subst
config_opts['extra_chroot_dirs'] = [ '/run/lock', ]
config_opts['releasever'] = ''
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf'
config_opts['yum.conf'] = """
[main]
keepcache=1
debuglevel=2
reposdir=/dev/null
logfile=/var/log/yum.log
retries=20
obsoletes=1
gpgcheck=0
assumeyes=1
syslog_ident=mock
syslog_device=
install_weak_deps=0
metadata_expire=0
mdpolicy=group:primary
# repos
[base-runtime]
name=base-runtime
baseurl=http://kojipkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/repos/module-base-runtime-m...
enabled=1
[local-override]
name=local-override
baseurl=file:///home/sgallagh/workspace/baseruntime/repos/override/
enabled=1
"""
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 1420347] New: CVE-2016-6199 gradle: Unsafe data deserialization in the ObjectSocketWrapper class [fedora-24]
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420347
Bug ID: 1420347
Summary: CVE-2016-6199 gradle: Unsafe data deserialization in
the ObjectSocketWrapper class [fedora-24]
Product: Fedora
Version: 24
Component: gradle
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, msimacek(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 1420339 (CVE-2016-6199)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420339
[Bug 1420339] CVE-2016-6199 gradle: Unsafe data deserialization in the
ObjectSocketWrapper class
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months