https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837523
Bug ID: 837523 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, jni@redhat.com, petersen@redhat.com, pwu@redhat.com Assignee: pwu@redhat.com Summary: Malformed fontconfig config file Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: tagoh@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: cjkuni-uming-fonts Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Still no changes in the behavior in the latest version of fontconfig, but it now warns when <test> contains multiple values or <alias> contains multiple <family>s. this is because the behavior isn't intuitive and doesn't work as expected necessarily. So you better consider to fix it to make clearer what you want to do with it.
For solution, if you are expecting OR operator with that rule, add more <match>s or <alias>es. if you are expecting AND operator with that rule, just add more <test>s in that <match>.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-48.fc17.src.rpm
How to reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce: 1. install the fonts package 2. fc-match
Actual results: Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-ttf-arphic-uming.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-ttf-arphic-uming.conf", line 34: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-ttf-arphic-uming.conf", line 60: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Expected results: no warnings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837523
Peng Wu pwu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefw@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Peng Wu pwu@redhat.com --- *** Bug 837550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837523
Peng Wu pwu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from Peng Wu pwu@redhat.com --- Rebuilt for rawhide.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837523
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-49.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-49...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837523
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-49.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-49.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10585/cjkuni-uming-fonts... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837523
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-07-20 22:51:21
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-49.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837523
--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com --- Since the behavior itself isn't changed in fontconfig, it may also affects to f16 that is still supported in Fedora. so can you push an update for f16 too?
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org