https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
Bug ID: 851825 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen@redhat.com, psatpute@redhat.com Assignee: psatpute@redhat.com Summary: Need consistent naming of glyphs across entire font family Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: All Reporter: deron.meranda@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Product: Fedora
Description of problem: Among all the different fonts within the Liberation family the naming of glyphs and mappings to Unicode codepoints should be consistent.
For example, the glyph named "fi" maps to U+FB01 in LiberationMono-Regular.sfd, but to U+F001 in LiberationSans-Italic.sfd.
Also, for the reverse mappings, the Unicode codepoint U+00B7 maps to glyph "middot.001" in LiberationMono-BoldItalic.sfd, but to a glyph named "middot" in LiberationSans-Regular.sfd and to "uni00B7" in LiberationSerif-Bold.sfd.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-2.00.0
Expected results: All the fonts in the font family should use consistent glyph names and unicode codepoints (when a particular character is in the font).
Additional info: The attachment lists all these inconsistencies. I've excluded cases where a particular glyph/character is not included in one font.
Note that many of these are simply cases where: * A glyph is not named (e.g., of the form "uniXXXX") * A glyph has no unicode assignment (value 1)
Also in a few cases there are glyphs that have multiple unicode codepoint assignments — see Bug #851790
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
--- Comment #1 from Deron Meranda deron.meranda@gmail.com --- Created attachment 607033 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=607033&action=edit List of inconsistently-named glyphs and unicode mappings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- resolved this and committed to upstream. Can you test it once from git repo?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- liberation-fonts-2.00.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liberation-fonts-2.00.1-1.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package liberation-fonts-2.00.1-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing liberation-fonts-2.00.1-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15393/liberation-fonts-2... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-12-20 11:24:16
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- liberation-fonts-2.00.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org