Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005
--- Comment #45 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-06 22:31:51 EDT ---
Here are summary of this bug's current status here:
This bug is discussing about how to deal with the binary model file, and about
3 solutions are posted here:
1. Consider zinnia-tomoe model data file arch-dependent, put the binary model
in %{_libdir}, or %{_datadir} with the the arch name as the model file postfix.
2. Consider zinnia-tomoe model data file endian-dependent only, and provide
both big-endian and little-endian model file.
3. Make a patch for zinnia, and make the model file completely
arch-independent. (Thanks for Peng Huang's patch, sent to upstream.)
Personally I prefer the solution 1 from Dennis Gilmore, and copy his comment
here:
Reading though this it will be simpler for long term management for
this to be
architecture specific. rpm doesn't understand endianness and trying to shoehorn
it in makes it much more complicated and difficult to work with.
Please decide how to solve this problem, thanks in advance.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.