Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460806
--- Comment #10 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com 2009-04-14 07:43:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9)
We are also working on this issue. You can download the *draft* locale files (for bn_BD) from [0]. There are two files; one for normal sequence (the way we taught in our childhood :-) and the second one for dictionary sequence [1].
but i think we can implement only one in glibc.
As the Bengali (bn) Collation sequence will be common for both Bangladesh (bn_BD) and India (bn_IN), we will work together.
Thats nice Now i think we can do more accurate work for Bengali collation.
It will be if you see once /usr/share/i18n/locales/iso14651_t1_common, this is common file for collation data and included in almost all locale file in LC_COLLATE section, We should also add Bengali collation data in this file only. Advantage of keeping collation data in this file is that, your collation data will be available to OS even if one select other locale. I saw your file, nice work, but it will be nice if you follow iso14651_t1_common file structure.
check my earlier comments, i have done some work for Bengali and it is in final stage, it will be nice if you check it once and suggest any modification if require.
It will be nice if Bengali India and Bangladesh collation orders are 100% same, but even if there are any difference it will not create any problem as both have different locale file and we can update differences in respective locale file. so it will not affect on and other. (for example, Devanagari script is share by Marathi, Hindi, Sanskrit language's though there basic sorting is in common file and some miscellaneous sorting stuff in respective locale file check mr_IN reorder)
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org