https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016989
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lohit-devel-list@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- This bug report is very clear and i agree with you. but surprisingly some fonts around does not follow it.
Dunno why people are considering U+0D28 and U+0D7B as equivalent.
In reality
u0D28 + u0D4D + u200D = u0D7B
I hope people around are not using this u0D28 instead of u0D7b and already created some data.