https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872512
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2020-70737cb107 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-70737cb107`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-70737cb107
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872512
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2020-a734ed490b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-a734ed490b`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a734ed490b
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872512
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |uim-1.8.8-6.20200828git0c2f
| |bfa6.fc34
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2020-08-28 12:29:51
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2020-629c35705c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717958
Riccardo Schirone <rschiron(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed In Version| |ibus 1.5.22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872512
dan.cermak(a)cgc-instruments.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|jsynacek(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #4 from dan.cermak(a)cgc-instruments.com ---
This is a bug in uim and not in emacs then, thus assigning to the uim
maintainer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649184
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed|2019-11-27 14:20:50 |2020-08-26 12:54:52
--- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> ---
Closing. thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649184
--- Comment #12 from Rajeesh <rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com> ---
Agreeing with Akira, necessary systems changes are already made in
`65-nonlatin.conf`, so we could consider this issue resolved. May I close the
bug report?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649184
--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> ---
We don't have all serif fonts installed by default and we have Rachana font
instead of Meera fonts for serif in 65-nonlatin.conf.
So actually this has already been fixed. but just need to install
smc-rachana-fonts to test.
There are no plan to install all serif fonts by default.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872512
--- Comment #3 from Edgar Hoch <edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de> ---
I have applied patch
https://github.com/uim/uim/commit/6e4e1a6488ef72cc86bd4413f1d6260117dab02...
to package uim-1.8.8-4.fc32.src.rpm and build a new package so I can test it.
It solves the problem, e.g. emacs works with uim* installed without error.
emacs still show the message "Package cl is deprecated" but this doesn't abort
the initialization of emacs. It may be that other packages calls emacs package
cl (but currently I don't know which). That should be another bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.