[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 841947] New: [te_IN] Add support for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha to Lohit Telugu font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841947
Bug ID: 841947
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Summary: [te_IN] Add support for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha
to Lohit Telugu font
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: lohit-telugu-fonts
Product: Fedora
Created attachment 599423
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=599423&action=edit
Glyphs for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha
Telugu script has special form of vowelless NA called four-pronged
nakaarapollu. Strictly speaking nakaarapollu means nakaara + pollu=virama so
regular form of vowelless-NA న్ is also nakaarapollu but Telugu old grammarian
Brown has specifically called a distinct form as nakaarapollu.
The recommended model for getting Telugu nakaarapollu is NA + ZWJ + VIRAMA.
Please find more details in the document:
https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/utcsubmissions/11409-telugu...
Likewise Telugu script has old repha form which is not found in common usage in
current Telugu script. A modern-style Telugu font can allow user to select
old-style reph by using the sequence RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CONSONANT because the
plain RA + VIRAMA + CONSONANT would be presented as RA with sub-base form of
CONSONANT.
Please find more details in the document:
https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/utcsubmissions/12017-telugu...
These two documents have been approved by the UTC in the Feb 2012 meeting:
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12007.htm
<quote>
[130-A15] Action Item for Deborah Anderson, Editorial Committee: Update the
core specification text on Telugu nakaara-pollu based on input in document
L2/11-409.
[130-A16] Action Item for Deborah Anderson: Incorporate text on Telugu Reph
from L2/12-017 into the Telugu block description.
</quote>
It is requested to:
1) add the glyphs for nakaarapollu and repha to the Lohit Telugu font:
2) add substitution mapping of NA + ZWJ + VIRAMA to the nakaarapollu glyph
3) add requisite OT markups for repha glyph so that a compliant OT system can
recognize the repha glyph and render sequence of RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CONS using
that glyph.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1438630] New: [abrt] ibus: __kernel_vsyscall(): ibus-dconf killed by SIGABRT
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438630
Bug ID: 1438630
Summary: [abrt] ibus: __kernel_vsyscall(): ibus-dconf killed by
SIGABRT
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: ibus
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: noobusinghacks(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, smaitra(a)redhat.com,
tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438621
Version-Release number of selected component:
ibus-1.5.14-5.fc25
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.8.0
backtrace_rating: 3
cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-dconf
crash_function: __kernel_vsyscall
executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-dconf
global_pid: 2053
kernel: 4.10.6-200.fc25.i686+PAE
pkg_fingerprint: 4089 D8F2 FDB1 9C98
pkg_vendor: Fedora Project
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 3 (7 frames)
#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 poll at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#3 g_poll at gpoll.c:124
#4 g_main_context_poll at gmain.c:4228
#6 g_main_context_iteration at gmain.c:3990
#7 dconf_gdbus_worker_thread at dconf-gdbus-thread.c:82
#8 g_thread_proxy at gthread.c:784
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1076190] New: Rendering of Unicode tie bars could be improved
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076190
Bug ID: 1076190
Summary: Rendering of Unicode tie bars could be improved
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: liberation-fonts
Severity: low
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 874108
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=874108&action=edit
comparison between Liberation Sans and Helvetica
Description of problem:
The rendering of the two Unicode tie bar combining characters (U+035E and
U+035F) is not ideal. In particular the characters are quite short and far away
from the characters they are tying together. This makes it appear more like a
misplaced macron than a tie bar. The rendering in Liberation Sans appears to be
equivalent to that of Arial which has the same issues. The rendering in
Helvetica is better (see attachment 1).
In particular, because the under tie bar (U+035F) is so far away from the other
characters, it sometimes gets clipped when rendered, as it appears to fall
slightly outside of the bounding box for the line height (see attachment 2).
My suggestion would be to make the length of both tie bars slightly longer, and
to move both of them slightly closer to the characters they are intended to tie
together.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
12-Mar-2014 (2.x)
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install latest Liberation Sans (and Helvetica if you want to compare)
2. Go to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Kaldari/Font_test_2
Actual results:
Tie bars should be slightly longer and closer to the other characters.
Expected results:
Tie bar are quite short and far away.
Additional info:
See attachments for more info.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hXKa1OSOTy&a=cc_unsubscribe
6 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1084227] New: Arrow symbols too small and not nicely aligned
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084227
Bug ID: 1084227
Summary: Arrow symbols too small and not nicely aligned
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: Eduard.Braun2(a)gmx.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 882471
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=882471&action=edit
testcase with some exemplary arrows
The arrow symbols contained in Liberation fonts seem to be too small and also a
little mis-aligned.
As an example consider the attached testcase which contains left/right/up/down
arrows exemplarily. The attached screenshot is a rendering of this file to
illustrate the issue:
- The arrows are much to small making them hardly discernible,
especially at small font sizes.
- The horizontally aligned arrows are positioned too low (nearly at the
baseline).
- Also visible: Hinting for the vertically aligned arrows is bad.
The screenshot was created with Firefox 28.0 on Windows 7.
The installed version of the Liberation fonts is 2.00.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=odcuTBmRHM&a=cc_unsubscribe
6 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1374611] New: [abrt] ibus: bus_dbus_impl_name_owner_changed(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGABRT
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374611
Bug ID: 1374611
Summary: [abrt] ibus: bus_dbus_impl_name_owner_changed():
ibus-daemon killed by SIGABRT
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: ibus
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: juliux.pigface(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, smaitra(a)redhat.com,
tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Here are the steps I followed:
1. Log in to a Gnome+Wayland session.
2. Log out, back to gdm.
3. Log in to a Gnome+Xorg session.
Version-Release number of selected component:
ibus-1.5.14-1.fc25
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.7.2
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon -r --xim
crash_function: bus_dbus_impl_name_owner_changed
executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon
global_pid: 2032
kernel: 4.8.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc25.x86_64
pkg_fingerprint: 4089 D8F2 FDB1 9C98
pkg_vendor: Fedora Project
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (5 frames)
#4 bus_dbus_impl_name_owner_changed at dbusimpl.c:1242
#9 bus_name_service_set_primary_owner at dbusimpl.c:368
#10 bus_dbus_impl_request_name at dbusimpl.c:1076
#11 call_in_idle_cb at gdbusconnection.c:4836
#17 bus_server_run at server.c:143
Potential duplicate: bug 1283406
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1410201] New: [abrt] ibus: bus_engine_proxy_new_internal(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGSEGV
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410201
Bug ID: 1410201
Summary: [abrt] ibus: bus_engine_proxy_new_internal():
ibus-daemon killed by SIGSEGV
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: ibus
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sbbaker65(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, smaitra(a)redhat.com,
tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
This happens at user login every time that I login. This user profile is an
upgrade from prior releases and may have some legacy data from other Gnome or
X11 desktops.
Version-Release number of selected component:
ibus-1.5.14-3.fc25
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.8.0
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline: ibus-daemon --xim --panel disable
crash_function: bus_engine_proxy_new_internal
executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon
global_pid: 22898
kernel: 4.8.15-300.fc25.x86_64
pkg_fingerprint: 4089 D8F2 FDB1 9C98
pkg_vendor: Fedora Project
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1001
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
#0 bus_engine_proxy_new_internal at engineproxy.c:660
#1 create_engine_ready_cb at engineproxy.c:737
#2 g_task_return_now at gtask.c:1121
#3 g_task_return at gtask.c:1179
#4 reply_cb at gdbusproxy.c:2583
#5 g_task_return_now at gtask.c:1121
#6 g_task_return at gtask.c:1179
#7 g_dbus_connection_call_done at gdbusconnection.c:5708
#8 g_task_return_now at gtask.c:1121
#9 complete_in_idle_cb at gtask.c:1135
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1374624] New: [abrt] ibus: _g_log_abort(): ibus-ui-gtk3 killed by SIGTRAP
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374624
Bug ID: 1374624
Summary: [abrt] ibus: _g_log_abort(): ibus-ui-gtk3 killed by
SIGTRAP
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: ibus
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: juliux.pigface(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, smaitra(a)redhat.com,
tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Here are the steps I followed:
1. Log in to a Gnome+Wayland session.
2. Log out, back to gdm.
3. Log in to a Gnome+Xorg session.
Version-Release number of selected component:
ibus-1.5.14-1.fc25
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.7.2
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-gtk3
crash_function: _g_log_abort
executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-gtk3
global_pid: 2056
kernel: 4.8.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc25.x86_64
pkg_fingerprint: 4089 D8F2 FDB1 9C98
pkg_vendor: Fedora Project
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (9 frames)
#0 _g_log_abort at gmessages.c:487
#1 g_log_writer_default at gmessages.c:2269
#2 g_log_structured_array at gmessages.c:1660
#3 g_log_structured at gmessages.c:1597
#4 gdk_event_source_check at gdkeventsource.c:92
#5 g_main_context_check at gmain.c:3760
#8 gtk_main at gtkmain.c:1295
#9 application_run at application.c:199
#10 application_main at application.c:269
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months