[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1349567] New: avoid using special purpose fonts such as apx-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349567
Bug ID: 1349567
Summary: avoid using special purpose fonts such as apx-fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I started noticing many web pages on firefox, icecat, etc using a rather
undesirable choice of fonts a while ago, and finally tracked it down with
gnome-font-viewer to see which font is that. It is apx-fonts .
/usr/share/fonts/apx/04b03.ttf .
The problem is that its name starts with "04b03", and therefore comes first in
a fair number of font matches (don't know the exact criteria, but often
enough)...
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
apx-fonts-0.1-3.fc23.noarch
fontconfig-2.11.94-4.fc23.x86_64
fontconfig-2.11.94-4.fc23.i686
How reproducible:
Always, since installing it (I installed a whole lot of fonts a while ago,
basically just did "dnf install -y *fonts").
Steps to Reproduce:
1. installing apx-fonts
2. go to some web sites
3.
Actual results:
undesirable font choice.
Expected results:
pick something more suitable.
Additional info:
I know I can configure it myself in ~/.config/fontconfig, but fedora should
help in avoiding these in the first place; since "dnf install -y *fonts" is
probably common enough action.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1428287] Review Request: cldr-emoji-annotation - Emoji annotation files in CLDR
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428287
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Small thing to fix
1) cldr-emoji-annotation.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 30.0.3-2_2
['30.0.3_2-2.fc26', '30.0.3_2-2']
=> fix the version string here
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "FSF Unlimited GPL", "FSF All
Permissive", "FSF Unlimited", "Unknown or generated". 104 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/parag/1428287-cldr-emoji-annotation/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/unicode(unicode-
ucd)
==> This is Okay as both are not dependent on each other
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: cldr-emoji-annotation-30.0.3_2-2.fc26.noarch.rpm
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel-30.0.3_2-2.fc26.noarch.rpm
cldr-emoji-annotation-30.0.3_2-2.fc26.src.rpm
cldr-emoji-annotation.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 30.0.3-2_2
['30.0.3_2-2.fc26', '30.0.3_2-2']
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
config -> con fig, con-fig, configure
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
cldr-emoji-annotation.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 30.0.3-2_2
['30.0.3_2-2.fc26', '30.0.3_2-2']
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
config -> con fig, con-fig, configure
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Requires
--------
cldr-emoji-annotation (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/pkg-config
cldr-emoji-annotation
pkgconfig
Provides
--------
cldr-emoji-annotation:
cldr-emoji-annotation
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel:
cldr-emoji-annotation-devel
pkgconfig(cldr-emoji-annotation)
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/fujiwarat/cldr-emoji-annotation/releases/download/30.0...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
8504a17aca042cd48590839a782c7d6c987c6d35982b487557effcbe5ea4e84b
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
8504a17aca042cd48590839a782c7d6c987c6d35982b487557effcbe5ea4e84b
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1428287 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1428287] Review Request: cldr-annotations - Emoji annotation files in CLDR
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428287
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Suggestions:
1) License should be "LGPLv2+ and Unicode" with comment above to license tag
as "# Annotation files are in Unicode license"
2) Package does not look compiling anything, why not make it noarch by adding
ExclusiveArch: noarch
We have similar pkgconfig file packaging in m17n-db-devel noarch package.
3) No known owner of /usr/share/cldr, /usr/share/cldr/common
I suggest upstream changes like install these files in /usr/share/unicode/cldr.
We already have unicode-ucd package which installs files in
/usr/share/unicode/ucd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] Broken dependencies: fcitx-libpinyin
by buildsys@fedoraproject.org
fcitx-libpinyin has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.x86_64 requires libpinyin.so.10()(64bit)
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.x86_64 requires libpinyin.so.10(LIBPINYIN)(64bit)
On armhfp:
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.armv7hl requires libpinyin.so.10
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.armv7hl requires libpinyin.so.10(LIBPINYIN)
On ppc64le:
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.ppc64le requires libpinyin.so.10()(64bit)
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.ppc64le requires libpinyin.so.10(LIBPINYIN)(64bit)
On aarch64:
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.aarch64 requires libpinyin.so.10()(64bit)
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.aarch64 requires libpinyin.so.10(LIBPINYIN)(64bit)
On ppc64:
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.ppc64 requires libpinyin.so.10()(64bit)
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.ppc64 requires libpinyin.so.10(LIBPINYIN)(64bit)
On i386:
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.i686 requires libpinyin.so.10
fcitx-libpinyin-0.4.1-2.fc26.i686 requires libpinyin.so.10(LIBPINYIN)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
7 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1419270] New: Log out option within im-chooser results in error
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419270
Bug ID: 1419270
Summary: Log out option within im-chooser results in error
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: im-chooser
Severity: low
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: oldregdata(a)km.ru
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
After some change within im-chooser, the log out button gets active, but
pressing it results in a "Could not connect to the session manager" error
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.6.6-1.fc25
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open im-chooser
2. Trigger some change (select 'Use X compose table' for example)
3. Press log out
Actual results:
"Could not connect to the session manager" error pops up
Expected results:
Session would exit to lightdm
Additional info:
Tried on both my actuall net install setup (im-chooser gets pulled with scim
package i installed), and on xfce live dvd (im-chooser is present by default),
the result is always the same.
xsession-errors only records 'Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient
parent. This is discouraged.' error.
journalctl seems to provide the following info on that matter:
Feb 05 00:03:42 localhost.localdomain com.redhat.imsettings[971]: [
1486217022.649999]: IMSettings-Daemon[991]: INFO: Attempting to switch IM to X
compose table [lang=en_US.utf8, desktop=(null), update=true]
Feb 05 00:03:43 localhost.localdomain com.redhat.imsettings[971]: [
1486217023.082856]: IMSettings-Daemon[991]: INFO: no need to invoke any
auxiliary process for X compose table
Feb 05 00:03:43 localhost.localdomain com.redhat.imsettings[971]: [
1486217023.084348]: IMSettings-GSettings backend[991]: INFO: Setting up xim:xim
as gtk+ immodule
Feb 05 00:03:47 localhost.localdomain sudo[2635]: user2 : TTY=pts/0 ;
PWD=/home/user2 ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/journalctl
Feb 05 00:03:47 localhost.localdomain audit[2635]: USER_CMD pid=2635 uid=1000
auid=1000 ses=2 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
msg='cwd="/home/user2" cmd="journalctl" terminal=pts/0 res=success'
Feb 05 00:03:47 localhost.localdomain audit[2635]: CRED_REFR pid=2635 uid=0
auid=1000 ses=2 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
msg='op=PAM:setcred grantors=pam_env,pam_fprintd acct="root"
exe="/usr/bin/sudo" hostname=? addr=? terminal=/dev/pts/0 res=success'
Feb 05 00:03:47 localhost.localdomain sudo[2635]: pam_systemd(sudo:session):
Cannot create session: Already running in a session
Feb 05 00:03:47 localhost.localdomain sudo[2635]: pam_unix(sudo:session):
session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 05 00:03:47 localhost.localdomain audit[2635]: USER_START pid=2635 uid=0
auid=1000 ses=2 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
msg='op=PAM:session_open
grantors=pam_keyinit,pam_limits,pam_keyinit,pam_limits,pam_systemd,pam_unix
acct="root" exe="/usr/bin/sudo" hostname=? addr=? terminal=/dev/pts/0
res=success'
Thanks for your time and efforts! Will be glad to provide further info
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months