[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1058044] Brazilian Keyboard layout not working in Fedora 20 (lack of slash and backslash keys)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058044
Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro <ricardojpinheiro(a)ibest.com.br> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(ricardojpinheiro@ |
|ibest.com.br) |
--- Comment #5 from Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro <ricardojpinheiro(a)ibest.com.br> ---
(In reply to Peter Hutterer from comment #4)
> whoah, next time please attach files that are longer than a couple of lines,
> it makes it easier to compare and search for things.
Yuch, sorry! :-(
> what does /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-keyboard.conf look like?
I changed with system-config-keyboard to br-abnt2.
It's shorter than those files I pasted above. :-)
# Read and parsed by systemd-localed. It's probably wise not to edit this file
# manually too freely.
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "system-keyboard"
MatchIsKeyboard "on"
Option "XkbLayout" "br"
Option "XkbModel" "abnt2"
EndSection
(...)
>
> looks like the keys are configured as it should be. Note that the drawing of
> the keyboard isn't always 100% accurate. What keycodes do the keys generate?
> should be 98 and 94 (xev will tell you).
I tried xev, pressed both keys, but it didn't gave me any answers. I tried a
USB mini-keyboard that I've got here, and I got 97 and 94.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V1mPTlrg1V&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1056845] New: some packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056845
Bug ID: 1056845
Summary: some packaging issues
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: smc-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007(a)gmail.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
Looks like when 6.0 update got pushed it was not cleanly packaged. The issues
in current spec I see are
1) rpmlint *.rpm
smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
smc-dyuthi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
smc-kalyani-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
smc-meera-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/smc-meera-fonts/COPYING
smc-rachana-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/smc-rachana-fonts/LICENSE
smc-rachana-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/smc-rachana-fonts/COPYING
smc-raghumalayalam-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
smc-suruma-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
=> Fix rpmlint warnings. There are documentation files also available for other
packages which says "no-documentation". Add those files.
2) Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
Note: %define requiring justification: %define fontname smc, %define
common_desc The SMC Fonts package contains fonts for the display
oftraditional and new Malayalam Script.
3) Every patch should provide reference for what purpose its used with related
bug link
4) Group tag is now optional and can be removed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
smc-fonts-6.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
How reproducible:
always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yugRMYMu7Y&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months