[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 583731] man-pages-de has file conflicts with man-db
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583731
Thomas Spura <tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura <tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-08-05 13:18:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It maskes no sense to have the language-specific files in man-db, does it? If I
> just install English, I don't want to haul extra baggage (French, Chinese, ...
> man pages) around. OTOH, this would mean either splitting man-db (and such)
> languagewise or including their manpages in the language-specific sets. A mess
> either way.
It's often the case, that a programm ships man pages for several languages. But
I don't think, that's negative. Sure it's an "extra baggage", but it keeps the
"mess" low, any you always get the latest man pages from upstream.
I've read somewhere, that the man-pages-* are outdated (not to say unusable) in
comparison with the original English man pages, so I suggest to remove
man-pages-de from the distribution...
Can someone verify, that the man pages are outdated?.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 583731] man-pages-de has file conflicts with man-db
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583731
John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(mail(a)romal.de)
--- Comment #10 from John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-05 12:47:23 EDT ---
What are the next steps and plans for fixing this bug? Can someone please
provide more information?
If this is in fact a blocker we can't compose the Fedora 14 Alpha Release
Candidate today unless it is fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 621242] Review Request: gyp - Generate Your Projects
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-05 04:17:53 EDT ---
Ah, yep. just copy and paste that there. anyway, thank you for the review.
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gyp
Short Description: Generate Your Projects
Owners: tagoh
Branches: f12 f13 f14
InitialCC:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 621242] Review Request: gyp - Generate Your Projects
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-08-05 03:44:22 EDT ---
Okay.
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Some notes:
> >
> > ! Unneeded macros
> > - You can remove %python_sitearch definition because it is uses nowhere.
>
> It was necessary to build on f12:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
- Well, what I meant here is while %python_sitelib definition is
needed for F=12, %python_sitearch definition is unneeded (because
this is noarch), however not a blocker.
---------------------------------------------------------------
This package (gyp) is APPROVED by mtasaka
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 578039] New: lang-specific overrides rule doesn't work as expected
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: lang-specific overrides rule doesn't work as expected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578039
Summary: lang-specific overrides rule doesn't work as expected
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-tamil-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Depends on: 578015
Blocks: 507684
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
All of detailed information is available on my post at the fonts list:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts/2010-March/001117.html
binding="same" in the fontconfig config file prevents to apply the rule for the
specific
language only properly. As a result, fonts is used for non-targetted languages
and it may gives different look and feel in some cases.
I'd propose to get rid of binding="same" from:
66-lohit-tamil.conf
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months