[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 489523] New: ibus oddities with F11 alpha
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus oddities with F11 alpha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489523
Summary: ibus oddities with F11 alpha
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jason(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
When I logged on to the F11 alpha live CD, there was a floating tab on my
desktop which seemed to be for selecting the iBus engine.
yum update ibus made it go away, but I got an error "GLib version too old
(micro mismatch)"; apparently 2.19.5 isn't enough for ibus-gtk. Updating glib2
to 2.19.10 seemed to fix that issue.
But now the input method chooser seems to be confused; enabling the input
method feature with Preferences/Personal/Input Method doesn't stick, if I open
the dialog again the checkbox is still off. Updating im-chooser didn't affect
this issue; the applet in the notification error pops up an error about
"mismatch the version of im-settings-daemon, no detailed information"
I haven't updated the whole system, as I don't think I have enough room on the
USB stick and yum is failing to update glibc at the moment. And I don't really
care about iBus, just wanted that floater to go away. Feel free to close this
bug if it doesn't have any useful information for you.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 501650] New: Add Help (Documentation) for ibus-setup UI
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Add Help (Documentation) for ibus-setup UI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501650
Summary: Add Help (Documentation) for ibus-setup UI
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
In iBus Preferences like "Use custom font", "Candidates orientation" and
"Previous input method:" (which is disabled always). Can we have some
help/documentation for end users about such unclear options?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-1.1.0.20090508-3.fc11.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
no documentation or tool-tips on usage/information of "Use custom font",
"Candidates orientation" and "Previous input method:"
Expected results:
Should add documentation
Additional info:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Days:IBus#cite_ref-18
Either Help button can be added with help on using ibus-setup or tooltip can be
provided for widgets used in ibus-setup UI.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 517361] New: autopoint tool fails due to missing cvs binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: autopoint tool fails due to missing cvs binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517361
Summary: autopoint tool fails due to missing cvs binary
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: gettext
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: berrange(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
I have a package which needs to run 'autoreconf' during its build to
re-generate autotools files. I have a BuildRequires: autoconf automake libtool
gettext to pull in the neccessary pieces for autoreconf to run, however it
still fails because for some crazy reason 'autopoint' requires CVS but does not
depend on it
+ autoreconf -if
autopoint: *** cvs program not found
autopoint: *** Stop.
autoreconf: autopoint failed with exit status: 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wXXjKZ (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wXXjKZ (%build)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1603572&name=build.log
# rpm -q gettext --requires | grep cvs
Note the missing dep on cvs, even though it is used.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gettext-0.17-12.fc11.i586
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install gettext
2. make sure cvs is not installed
3. Ru autopoint
Actual results:
Fails due to missing cvs
Expected results:
Installing the RPM installs all binaries required for the RPM to work.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 520037] New: [sd_IN@devanagari] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Sindhi font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [sd_IN@devanagari] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Sindhi font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037
Summary: [sd_IN@devanagari] ]Need fontconfig rules for Lohit
Sindhi font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Need to add fontspecific fontconfig rule file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-fonts-2.4.1-1.fc12
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
No fontconfig rule for Sindhi (Devanagari) font
Expected results:
Should have fontconfig rule for Sindhi (Devanagari) font
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 499880] New: tomoe-gtk not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: tomoe-gtk not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499880
Summary: tomoe-gtk not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Patch
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: tomoe-gtk
AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, dchen(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 496968
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=343135)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343135)
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Fix attached, see bug 496968 for more info.
I think this is quite obviously an upstream bug; a corresponding patch to
macros/python.m4 should be submitted there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519769] New: Fix typo in dictionary
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Fix typo in dictionary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519769
Summary: Fix typo in dictionary
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: anthy
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: masanari_iida(a)hp.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Fix typo in compound.t
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anthy-9100h-7
Wrong: せかいせいふく #T35 #_3世界_4制服
Correct: せかいせいふく #T30 #_3世界_4征服
Wrong: げんかんしょうめい #T35 #_4玄関_5証明
Correct: げんかんしょうめい #T35 #_4玄関_5照明
Wrong: こうかいはんてい #T30 #_4高階_4判定
Correct: こうかいはんてい #T30 #_4公開_4判定
Wrong: ひなんじゃくしゃ #T35 #_3非難_5弱者
Correct: ひなんじゃくしゃ #T35 #_3避難_5弱者
Wrong: ひなんたいろ #T35 #_3非難_3退路
Correct: ひなんたいろ #T35 #_3避難_3退路
Wrong: あいずしっき #T35 #_3会津_3漆器
Correct: あいづしっき #T35 #_3会津_3漆器
Wrong: てきようりょういき #T35 #_4適要_5領域
Correct: てきようりょういき #T35 #_4適用_5領域
Wrong: しょうかようすい #T35 #c_4用水
Correct: しょうかようすい #T35 #_4消化_4用水
Wrong: あゆついじゅう #T35 #_2阿諛_5追従
Correct: あゆついしょう #T35 #_2阿諛_5追従
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: un-core-fonts
AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 8 months