[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 503185] New: Can't open skk-e21.el
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Can't open skk-e21.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
Summary: Can't open skk-e21.el
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ddskk
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: yamato(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=345907)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345907)
Fixes this bug.
Description of problem:
To use ddskk(ddskk-12.2.0-12.fc11.noarch) on emacs(emacs-22.3-11.fc11.x86_64),
emacs complains "Can't find skk-e21.el".
In SKK-MK of the ddskk package , which is part of ddskk build system, the
version number of emacs is checked to decide whether skk-e21.el should be
installed or not. The SKK-MK expects emacs-21 to install skk-e21.el. However,
emacs on F11 is emacs-22. There is a gap.
Attached patch is taken from upstream skk code. In the patch mule version is
checked instead of emacs version to decide whether skk-e21.el should be
installed or not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ddskk-12.2.0-12.fc11.noarch
emacs-22.3-11.fc11.x86_64
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install the packages.
2. emacs
3. M-x load-library: skk
Actual results:
"Can't find skk-e21.el" is messaged.
Expected results:
Skk works fine.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737
Thomas Spura <tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura <tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-11-11 07:54:31 EDT ---
Just a few comments:
- BR: python-setuptools is enought not -devel
- Could not download the source -> 404, had to unpack the src.rpm
- rpmlint:
$ rpmlint yum-langpacks.spec yum-langpacks-0.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm noarch/yum-
langpacks-0.1.3-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
yum-langpacks.spec:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins
/langpacks.py*
yum-langpacks.src:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/yum-plugins
/langpacks.py*
yum-langpacks.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.2-1
['0.1.3-1.fc11', '0.1.3-1']
yum-langpacks.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/yum-plugins
/langpacks.py 0644 /bin/env
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings.
* non-execuatble-script: see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_shebang_from_files
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 7 months