Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Provide native systemd services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Summary: Provide native systemd services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ebnetd AssignedTo: tagoh@redhat.com ReportedBy: johannbg@hi.is QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh@redhat.com, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Description of problem:
Let's get the ball rolling on this one...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #1 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-12 18:02:04 EDT --- Created attachment 522810 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522810 http socket
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #2 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-12 18:02:40 EDT --- Created attachment 522811 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522811 http service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #3 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-12 18:03:23 EDT --- Created attachment 522812 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522812 ebnetd socket
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #4 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-12 18:04:07 EDT --- Created attachment 522813 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522813 ebnetd service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #5 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-12 18:04:50 EDT --- Created attachment 522814 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522814 ndtpd socket
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #6 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-12 18:06:39 EDT --- Created attachment 522815 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522815 ndtpd service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #7 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-12 18:07:12 EDT --- Once package and shipped your package should no longer have to depend on xinetd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-09-16 02:44:05 EDT --- Thanks for working on this. FWIW is this supposed to be obsolete the xinetd support as well? just wonder if I should get rid of the dependency with it or still keep it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #9 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johannbg@hi.is 2011-09-16 15:40:35 EDT --- Well you can your component no longer should haver to depend on xinetd since it now ships unit files that do exactly the same thing.
We dont have anykind of policy around migrating from xinetd to systemd but I assume that fpc would be consistent in their work and ask maintainers to package xinetd snippets into an seperated xinet subpackages should they want to continue to ship xinetd snippets as is being done with legacy sysv init scripts.
I also recommend that your rename http unit files to ebhttp to avoid potential conflicts with apache.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@redhat.com Blocks| |713562(SysVtoSystemd)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-09-20 02:06:17 EDT --- Okay, thanks. for renaming, I was about to do that.
One more question though, how can I test this if it works as expected? I tried to do systemctl enable ndtpd.socket and ndtpd.service though, when connecting to the port 2882, it was just refused. and systemctl status ndtpd.socket gives me failed then. systemctl status ndtpd.service also says failed but there are no logs in /var/log/messages systemd brought up the ndtpd daemon at all.
The testing package is available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3354914
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(johannbg@hi.is)
--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-11-08 03:08:35 EST --- Rereading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd, and the service file seems missing Wants= line for .socket. however the daemon still not running successfully because of the failure on getpeername().
I'm expecting systemd will invoke the service when the socket is accepted though, as per this behavior, it seems not. any idea to get this working on systemd anyway?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2012-05-14 03:44:35 EDT --- Okay, finally I got it. fixed in 1.0-12.fc18
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-14 03:57:41 EDT --- ebnetd-1.0-12.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ebnetd-1.0-12.fc17
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-14 03:59:48 EDT --- ebnetd-1.0-12.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ebnetd-1.0-12.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-14 04:06:24 EDT --- ebnetd-1.0-12.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ebnetd-1.0-12.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-14 22:33:15 EDT --- Package ebnetd-1.0-12.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ebnetd-1.0-12.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7866/ebnetd-1.0-12.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Flags|needinfo?(johannbg@hi.is) | Last Closed| |2012-05-24 19:52:35
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ebnetd-1.0-12.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ebnetd-1.0-12.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737695
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ebnetd-1.0-12.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org