https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933105
Bug ID: 1933105
Summary: Wrong characted for Numpad dot key
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Status: NEW
Component: xkeyboard-config
Assignee: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: joshas(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
negativo17(a)gmail.com, peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Pressing "dot" (period) key on Numpad, when Num Lock is enabled should produce
"," (comma) character when Lithuanian keyboard layout is selected. Currently it
always writes "." (dot/period) character, which is not correct decimal
separator for Lithuanian keyboard layout. Using GNOME DE on Wayland.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
n/a
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to "Lithuanian" keyboard layout.
2. Turn on Num Lock on Numpad
3. Press "." (dot/period/Del) key on NumPad
Actual results:
Character "." (dot/period) is written on screen.
Expected results:
Character "," (comma) is written on screen.
Additional info:
Not really sure when this change happened, but probably not longer than a month
ago. Noticed today on desktop PC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853937
--- Comment #32 from James <james(a)ettle.org.uk> ---
Seems fixed on my F34 box running freetype-2.10.4-3.fc34.x86_64,
harfbuzz-2.7.4-3.fc34.x86_64 -- OK to close as fixed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464310
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed In Version|liberation-fonts-2.1.3-1.fc |liberation-fonts-2.1.3-1.fc
|33 |33
| |liberation-fonts-2.1.3-1.fc
| |32
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2021-f9988e8af6 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936377
Bug ID: 1936377
Summary: iso-codes-4.6.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: iso-codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 4.6.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.5.0-3.fc34
URL: https://salsa.debian.org/iso-codes-team/iso-codes
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1406/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683325
Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|32 |33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749943
Bug ID: 1749943
Summary: pango contain header with wrong hb.h include
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: vascom2(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I am try to build eiskaltdcpp and it fsilrd with error:
BUILDSTDERR: /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pango-coverage.h:28:10: fatal error:
hb.h: No such file or directory
BUILDSTDERR: 28 | #include <hb.h>
BUILDSTDERR: | ^~~~~~
Full build log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5226/37235226/build.log
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.44.6-1.fc32
How reproducible:
Always.
As I see this line was added in pango 1.44. But harfbuzz's hb.h in Fedora
placed at /usr/include/harfbuzz/
Need to solve it for build other packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931298
Bug ID: 1931298
Summary: URL tag is outdated
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: scim-m17n
Severity: low
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The URL "http://www.scim-im.org/projects/imengines" used in the URL tag for the
binary package scim-m17n is outdated. https://github.com/scim-im/scim-m17n
appears to be working.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931293
Bug ID: 1931293
Summary: URL tag is outdated
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: scim-hangul
Severity: low
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The URL "http://www.scim-im.org/" used in the URL tag for the binary package
scim-hangul is outdated. https://sourceforge.net/projects/scim/ appears to be
the original project home, however at https://github.com/scim-im there is
apparently some recent (minor) development, and Debian also favours the GitHub
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931297
Bug ID: 1931297
Summary: URL tag is outdated
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: scim-fcitx
Severity: low
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The URL "http://www.scim-im.org/projects/imengines/" used in the URL tag for
the binary packages scim-fcitx and scim-fcitx-tools is outdated.
https://github.com/scim-im/scim-fcitx appears to be working.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931295
Bug ID: 1931295
Summary: URL tag is outdated
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: scim-bridge
Severity: low
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The URL "http://www.scim-im.org/projects/scim_bridge" used in the URL tag for
the binary packages scim-bridge, scim-bridge-gtk, scim-bridge-qt and
scim-bridge-qt3 is outdated. https://github.com/scim-im/scim-bridge seems to
be working.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.