https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
eosrei-emojione-fonts-1.0-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-25da69a47f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #8)
> (In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
> > > 2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
> > > /usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
> >
> > Can you please file a separate bug about this?
>
> FWIW, I'm not really sure of why we'd need that when both cantarell and
> emojione are pulled in by portion of our default desktop.
Hm, You are right. I am not sure if this can be a new topic of discussion. We
have almost all fonts providing metainfo files and then some fonts are already
present in default desktop installation. Not sure if we want to remove metainfo
files from them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
--- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #7)
> (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
> > 2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
> > /usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
>
> Can you please file a separate bug about this?
FWIW, I'm not really sure of why we'd need that when both cantarell and
emojione are pulled in by portion of our default desktop.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
--- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
> 1) I am not sure if something is wrong on my f27 system but following does
> not give any output to me whereas all other fonts are giving some output.
>
> sudo dnf repoquery --provides eosrei-emojione-fonts
> sudo dnf repoquery --requires eosrei-emojione-fonts
$ rpm -q --provides eosrei-emojione-fonts
eosrei-emojione-fonts = 1.0-4.fc27
font(emojione)
As expected.
> 2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
> /usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
Can you please file a separate bug about this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org, panemade(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
1) I am not sure if something is wrong on my f27 system but following does not
give any output to me whereas all other fonts are giving some output.
sudo dnf repoquery --provides eosrei-emojione-fonts
sudo dnf repoquery --requires eosrei-emojione-fonts
2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
/usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469407
--- Comment #39 from Debarshi Ray <debarshir(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Saurav Sengupta from comment #36)
> The upgrade works fine on an installed system, but this still doesn't
> (understandably) resolve the issue in the Anaconda installer on the live
> image. A new ISO image with the upgrade included would help future
> installations.
Fedora (famously) never issues updated installation images after the point-0
release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469407
Jiri Konecny <jkonecny(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xperimenterx(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #38 from Jiri Konecny <jkonecny(a)redhat.com> ---
*** Bug 1491041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.