thanks. There’s enough jargon in this that I’m not sure I understand. What’s the
difference in level of QA between freeipa in Stream and RHEL? I’d be happy to have new
versions of IPA sooner, if they’ve actually been tested well enough that they’re ready for
the next RHEL release. Are things in good enough shape that it would make sense to convert
to stream now?
Do you think the in-place upgrade of Centos to RHEL would be safe to do with freeipa? I’d
assume there’s no actual difference in the packages.
I’m really only concerned with IPA. We use Ubuntu for everything else. We’re a computer
science department. Our researchers want Ubuntu, and we have to do what our users want.
On Dec 9, 2020, at 11:23 AM, Alexander Bokovoy
<abokovoy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I can only talk about FreeIPA and few other projects I am involved with.
For example, we are getting incredible feedback from both Rawhide and
RHEL 8.x QA processes for FreeIPA 4.9.0 release candidates. The packages
are not yet in RHEL 8.x development composes as we do fixes to issues
found through the QA pre-verification work. Once overall state of the
release candidate is at the level RHEL IdM QA team accepts, those
packages will get to RHEL composes and eventually land in C8S (once the
infra is ready). Once C8S is there in full capacity and running upstream
CI tests on it would become a reality, we'll see even more shortening of
that feedback loop length.