On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Wojtek Walczak wrote:
> If the goals of EKG project are much different than what I described
> then there is really no point in implementing it. The only problem is
> that at the moment I can't see clear strategy of future development,
> and outsiders like me may find it confusing. I mean, the ideas page
> says that GSoCers should come with their ideas of data mining, but
> it's really hard to guess what else can we mine in here if we do not
> agree to do something more complicated than counting the domains.
>
> I do not feel very attached to my initial idea. It may go to the bin.
> But I think that there is not enough pointers for GSoCers to go the
> way you would like them to go.
>
Regardless of anything else, I'm impressed with the way you think,
articulate yourself, and hold your own on the mailing list.
We've got bits and pieces of the EKG roadmap in various messages in this
thread. I'm trying to find the time in the next 48 hours to write *my*
vision of what the roadmap should be, and at least put that up for
discussion.
--Max
_______________________________________________
ekg mailing list
ekg(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/ekg
+1.
Ideally a Roadmap as "mission statement" would be nice in addition to
just a list of features, so folks can know that expansions that reach us
closer to that plan would be fair game.
And of course a list of features too :)
I'll wait for that thread.
--Michael