https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255007
--- Comment #32 from virtualeyes <sit1way(a)hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Alexander Kurtakov from comment #31)
(In reply to virtualeyes from comment #30)
> (In reply to Alexander Kurtakov from comment #28)
> > downloads page means
eclipse.org downloaded eclipse? Does it happen if you
> > run Eclipse from Fedora rpms (we usually have a bunch of backported patch to
> > make it run better/smoother) ?
>
> Yes, I run a minimal eclipse install (platform binary + jdt) so distro
> supplied full SDK won't do the trick unfortunately.
you can get exactly that by doing yum install eclipse-jdt.
Very nice to know, thank you!
>
> Is there a list of Fedora-specific bugs that have been addressed in the Neon
> patched versions?
One can look at patches applied in
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/eclipse.git/tree/eclipse.spec . For
the record - most of the time it's not Fedora specific bugs but generic bugs
which we fix upstream and apply to Fedora packages so Fedora users don't
have to leave with them until next upstream Eclipse release.
Right, meant which upstream bugs have been fixed; want to see if upgrading to
recently released F24 will resolve current Neon issues or if it's better to
wait things to settle a bit.
As is pre-Neon Eclipse is fine here, just curious to check some of the new
features (like toggle show/hide all toolbars)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.