[Bug 1008186] New: ACPICA Tools Update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008186
Bug ID: 1008186
Summary: ACPICA Tools Update
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: ahs3(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, okrh(a)johnfreed.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998504
Blocks: 1008185
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998504 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: ACPICA Tools Update
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AcpicaTools
For developers working with the ACPI subsystem, there are tools available from
the reference implementation at http://www.acpica.org. These tools have been
restructured over time and the current Fedora packages as a result contain
either outdated versions or do not make available a complete set of tools. We
propose an acpica-tools package that replaces both the existing iasl package
and the the existing pmtools package in order to make all current tools
available, and make it more straightforward in the future to keep them
up-to-date.
--- Additional comment from Al Stone on 2013-08-28 18:08:23 EDT ---
Package has been uploaded into git and builds done for all architectures for
f20.
--- Additional comment from John Freed on 2013-09-09 04:02:26 EDT ---
acpica-tools obsoletes pmtools, but it appears it should also obsolete iasl:
Transaction check error:
file /usr/bin/iasl from install of acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64
conflicts with file from package iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man1/iasl.1.gz from install of
acpica-tools-20130823-2.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
iasl-20120913-7.fc19.x86_64
Erasing iasl and installing acpica-tools works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1001339] New: Migrate to Bluez 5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001339
Bug ID: 1001339
Summary: Migrate to Bluez 5
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bnocera(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
kalevlember(a)gmail.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998563
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998563 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Migrate to Bluez 5
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Bluez5
BlueZ is the Linux Bluetooth stack for managing wireless Bluetooth devices. In
Fedora 20, we are going to switch from BlueZ version 4 to version 5.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-August/0012...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1001377] New: Perl 5.18
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001377
Bug ID: 1001377
Summary: Perl 5.18
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998584
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998584 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Perl 5.18
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/perl5.18
A new perl 5.18 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of
development. See 5.18.0 perldelta for more details.
--- Additional comment from Jitka Plesnikova on 2013-08-23 04:40:10 EDT ---
Perl has been updated and the most of packages was rebuilt.
All packages, which was not built, are listed on the feature page.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:25:18 EDT ---
(In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1)
> Perl has been updated and the most of packages was rebuilt.
> All packages, which was not built, are listed on the feature page.
Thank you, I'm changing bug state to MODIFIED now to reflect current Change
state.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-June/001158...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1008231] New: SSSD CIFS plugin
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008231
Bug ID: 1008231
Summary: SSSD CIFS plugin
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhrozek(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sbose(a)redhat.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998544
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998544 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: SSSD CIFS plugin
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SSSD_CIFS_plugin
During the F20 development cycle, the SSSD will provide an ID-mapping
plugin for cifs-utils so that Windows SIDs can be mapped onto POSIX IDs
and/or names without requiring Winbind and using the same code as the SSSD uses
for identity information.
--- Additional comment from Sumit Bose on 2013-08-28 11:40:40 EDT ---
The public interfaces for SID related queries are available and testable. The
plugin for the cifs-utils is planned for the next SSSD release which is aligned
with the Fedora 20 beta schedule.
----------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185376.html
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1008200] New: GNOME 3.10
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008200
Bug ID: 1008200
Summary: GNOME 3.10
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998518
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998518 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: GNOME 3.10
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Gnome3.10
Update GNOME to the latest upstream release
--- Additional comment from Matthias Clasen on 2013-08-23 10:44:03 EDT ---
3.9.90 is in f20
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001192...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1008219] New: Plasma-nm
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008219
Bug ID: 1008219
Summary: Plasma-nm
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jgrulich(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
ltinkl(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998531
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998531 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Plasma-nm
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Plasma-nm
Replace current network applet in KDE with a new one and bring the latest news
in NetworkManager to KDE.
--- Additional comment from Lukáš Tinkl on 2013-08-20 08:27:16 EDT ---
This change is currently fully working and in testable state, using:
$ yum install kde-plasma-nm
------------------------------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185649.html
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1008193] New: Developer Assistant GUI
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008193
Bug ID: 1008193
Summary: Developer Assistant GUI
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bkabrda(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, phracek(a)redhat.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998501
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998501 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Developer Assistant GUI
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/DeveloperAssistantGUI
The feature aims to provide GUI for devassistant package.
--- Additional comment from Petr Hracek on 2013-08-23 03:53:55 EDT ---
Main Developer Assistant GUI is finished and testable.
Problem with aborting project creation was already solved.
GUI for creation of user assistants depends on some devassistant-lint engine
which is not implemented yet (will be in future).
devassistant-lint program should check whether yaml assistant is correct and
runnable by devassistant engine.
Developer Assistant Creator GUI can be used only for beginners which do not
want to use any command line or IDE editor for YAML files.
Field "Fixed in Version" will be filled during next week when will be a new
release
--- Additional comment from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda on 2013-08-28 07:57:30 EDT
---
Testable in devassistant-0.6.1-2.fc20 by invoking "da-gui".
---------------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001190...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1001359] New: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001359
Bug ID: 1001359
Summary: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: a.badger(a)gmail.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, toshio(a)fedoraproject.org,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998574
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998574 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and
greater
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Python_setuptools_0.7
Update to a new upstream release of python-setuptools that is not completely
compatible with previous releases. The python-setuptools "major" version may
be higher than 0.7.x as there's some other structural changes happening that
should not affect API.
--- Additional comment from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi on 2013-08-26 12:51:51 EDT
---
Currently, no rawhide packages are known to be incompatible with the updated
setuptools. Moving to MODIFIED.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-June/001159...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 4 months
[Bug 1029712] New: Suggestions for documentation improvement.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029712
Bug ID: 1029712
Summary: Suggestions for documentation improvement.
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: r.landmann(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com, me(a)petetravis.com,
mmcallis(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com,
r.landmann(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 994794
Thanks Leslie:
Cloning to separate the Document Conventions suggestions from the Install Guide
suggestions.
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #994794 +++
Improvement recommendation for Install Guide.
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/Ins...
Under
1.1. Typographic Conventions
The indented paragraph reads
To see the contents of the file my_next_bestselling_novel in your current
working directory, enter the cat my_next_bestselling_novel command at the shell
prompt and press Enter to execute the command.
I would replace the word "see" with view.
To view the contents of the...
See for me, would be the result of issuing the ls command. See the file, view
the contents.
As an aside, for French translation, "to see" translates to "regarder"
whereas view tranlates to "voir". A similar difference is with Spanish
Please correct for Fedora 20.
======
Further on the same page...
Warnings should not be ignored. Ignoring warnings will most likely cause data
loss.
My comment.
Warnings do not cause data loss. Warnings advise of a situation that if not
attended to, will most likely cause data loss.
=======
Follow page with Introduction
Introduction
This guide covers installation of Fedora, a Linux distribution built on free
and open source software.
Please change ... built on ... to built with.
My reasoning... You may be on topic, or build on a foundation, but Fedora is
built with free and open source software
=======
Another question. Would you say, "Install Fedora on a computer," or would you
say "Install Fedora onto a computer"?
My preference is to drop the "on a computer". That would shorten the sentence
and accommodate some future hardware device.
=======
2.1.1. How Do I Download Installation Files?
To follow a Web-based guide to downloading, visit
http://get.fedoraproject.org/. For guidance on which architecture to download,
refer to Section 2.1.2, “Which Architecture Is My Computer?”.
Would the meaning be more clear if the title started with the word "Of" as in
"Of which Architecture Is My Computer?"
(sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3)
--- Additional comment from Pete Travis on 2013-08-08 20:59:31 EDT ---
The "Typographic Conventions" content is defined by publican, the publishing
tool used to create the guide.
--- Additional comment from Leslie Satenstein on 2013-08-15 15:36:18 EDT ---
In the installation guide, I noted that chapter two and following that
"the discussion is about downloading the various versions of Fedora
(netinstall, dvd, etc)."
Then aas a follow up, there is a long discussion about which version of Fedora
is the one to select from a list of options based on architecture and the like.
Should not the latter documentation section precede the downloading
information? As the comments in the guide were "for new users of Linux and
experienced ones", the guide may (in my opinion) be presenting information that
the individual should know about before downloading or acquiring any version.
Most users of technical manuals do a two pass read.
The first read is to get an appreciation of the product and guide, and the
second pass is to follow the recipe. By following the recipe, it should be
a) step one, determine your version and suitability of hardware
b) step two determine the version of Fedora you want to install (32bit/64bit)
etc.
c) Download/acquire
....
and so forth.
The guide is almost in the step by step recipe sequence,
If you go forward, would the improvements be present before Fedora 20,so the
new sequence could be ready for a reviewer and his comments? And if you keep
the sequence, I presume the update draft would also be ready for the reviewers
and their comments.
--- Additional comment from Leslie Satenstein on 2013-08-15 15:37:32 EDT ---
In the installation guide, I noted that chapter two and following that
"the discussion is about downloading the various versions of Fedora
(netinstall, dvd, etc)."
Then aas a follow up, there is a long discussion about which version of Fedora
is the one to select from a list of options based on architecture and the like.
Should not the latter documentation section precede the downloading
information? As the comments in the guide were "for new users of Linux and
experienced ones", the guide may (in my opinion) be presenting information that
the individual should know about before downloading or acquiring any version.
Most users of technical manuals do a two pass read.
The first read is to get an appreciation of the product and guide, and the
second pass is to follow the recipe. By following the recipe, it should be
a) step one, determine your version and suitability of hardware
b) step two determine the version of Fedora you want to install (32bit/64bit)
etc.
c) Download/acquire
....
and so forth.
The guide is almost in the step by step recipe sequence,
If you go forward, would the improvements be present before Fedora 20,so the
new sequence could be ready for a reviewer and his comments? And if you keep
the sequence, I presume the update draft would also be ready for the reviewers
and their comments.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994794
[Bug 994794] Suggestions for documentation improvement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1008204] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008204
Bug ID: 1008204
Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
pspacek(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, tbabej(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998522
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC
FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured
zones.
--- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT ---
This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned
for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule.
--- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT ---
It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for
Fedora 20 beta.
From:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan
Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface
(i.e. revert patches for user interface)
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT ---
Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently
planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version
to rawhide.
Thanks for update!
-----------------------------------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months