[Bug 982656] New: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation Complete
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982656
Bug ID: 982656
Summary: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation
Complete
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Keywords: Documentation
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pkovar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Hey Petr,
Just a couple of suggestions for section 9.17. Installation Complete
"Now that you have configured the remaining settings, your Fedora installation
is now complete!" --> "Now that you have configured the remaining settings,
your Fedora installation is complete."
"9.17.1. Initial Setup in GNOME" --> GNOME Initial Setup
"haven't" --> "have not"
"The Initial Setup application is only available for GNOME."
This might need some rewording since we now have two initial setup apps in
Fedora (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewFirstboot,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/InitialExperience) that do almost the
same thing, but target different DEs.
"create an user account" --> "create a user account"
"After you are finished configuring" --> "After you have finished configuring"
"On the first login, the Gnome Help application will automatically open"
The application is called Yelp, not Gnome Help. However, you probably just want
to mention that "GNOME Help will automatically open...".
"Figure 9.40. Language selection in Gnome Initial Setup" --> "Language
selection in GNOME Initial Setup"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 904083] New: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904083
Bug ID: 904083
Summary: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not?
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: storage-administration-guide
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: q2dg(a)yahoo.es
I've seen in http://docs.fedoraproject.org that last version of "Storage
Administration Guide" is for Fedora 14. It's more than two years ago!!
I don't know if this fact is due to this guide doesn't need any update or if
it's due to a lack of love from editors.
I want to notify this in Bugzilla to remember this situation, but I'm not sure
it is really a bug...
Could you tell me the reason of this abandonment?
Thanks!!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 1010674] New: kdeaccessibility
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010674
Bug ID: 1010674
Summary: kdeaccessibility
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: accessibility-guide
Assignee: gerard(a)ryan.lt
Reporter: cickumqt(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: gerard(a)ryan.lt, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Hi,
In transifex:
"In Fedora, <application>KMouseTool</application> is packaged in the
<package>kdeaccessibility</package> package. This package also contains
kmagnifier, kmouth, and ktts, all of which are discussed in other areas of this
guide. To install <package>kdeaccessibility</package> you can either select
<menuchoice><guilabel>System > Administration > Add/Remove
Software</guilabel></menuchoice> and then type in
<package>kdeaccessibility</package> in the screen that pops up, or in a
terminal window type su -c "yum install kdeaccessibility"."
I just searched and found kmousetool has been packaged as standalone package
from f20, should we revise the doc?
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 982517] New: 4.4.1. Adding a New User
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982517
Bug ID: 982517
Summary: 4.4.1. Adding a New User
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In section 4.4.1 at item number 6 explaining the user creation process, it is
inferred that the contents of /etc/skel are as follows:
.
..
.bash_logout
.bash_profile
.bashrc
.gnome2
.mozilla
They are in fact:
.
..
.bash_logout
.bash_profile
.bashrc
.mozilla
.zshrc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 1023496] New: 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection - no IPsec tab found
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023496
Bug ID: 1023496
Summary: 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection - no IPsec tab
found
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bobgus(a)rcn.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Created attachment 816182
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=816182&action=edit
When I type system-config-network, this is what I see
Description of problem:
In section 4.2.1.6.1. Host-to-Host Connection
The first few steps don't seem to work:
1) In a command shell, type system-config-network to start the Network
Administration Tool.
2) On the IPsec tab, click New to start the IPsec configuration wizard.
I don't see any IPsec tab.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@hoho6 user1]# uname -a
Linux hoho6.chidig.com 3.11.6-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 18 22:34:18 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@hoho6 user1]#
I did a yum update a few minutes ago.
How reproducible:
every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open a terminal session, log in as root
2. type 'system-config-network'
3. look for IPsec tab.
Actual results:
Could not find IPsec tab
Expected results:
Found IPsec tab
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 891931] New: Chapter 3
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891931
Bug ID: 891931
Summary: Chapter 3
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: jwboyer(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I wrote this a couple of weeks ago:
http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46149.html
It details building a custom kernel. Feel free to use anything you'd like from
there. However, it doesn't cover:
- generating your own key/certs
- signing shim or grub2 (trivially derived from the existing kernel example)
- third party module signing
Peter is working on a tool to make generating certs that UEFI likes easier for
people. I was waiting for that tool to be available before really covering
those aspects, as that is what we want users to use.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 1035500] New: F19 security guide - iptables intallation command is wrong
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035500
Bug ID: 1035500
Summary: F19 security guide - iptables intallation command is
wrong
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: maxime.carron(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
The command to install iptables-services is wrong in fedora 19 documentation
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Current version (fedora 19), security guide, chapter "3.8.9.1. Using the
iptables service"
link :
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Security_Guide/sec-Dis...
Actual results:
quote :
Then install the iptables-service package by entering the following command as
root:
~]# iptables-service
Expected results:
The command should be :
yum install iptables-services
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 995595] New: Allocators.xml
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995595
Bug ID: 995595
Summary: Allocators.xml
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: defensive-coding-guide
Assignee: fweimer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: fweimer(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In Allocators.xml, line 135 to 138, you write:
" .... For instance,
to allocate an array of <literal>n</literal> elements of type
<literal>T</literal>, check that the requested size is not
greater than <literal>n / sizeof(T)</literal>."
It is not rather?
" .... For instance,
to allocate an array of <literal>n</literal> elements of type
<literal>T</literal>, check that the requested size is not
smaller than <literal>n * sizeof(T)</literal>."
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 1030257] New: Typo Fedora Amateur Radio Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030257
Bug ID: 1030257
Summary: Typo Fedora Amateur Radio Guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: amateur-radio-guide
Assignee: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Reporter: ikhyar.com(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: sparks(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
in transifex contain space typos in words "e dge" to "edge"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): transifex
How reproducible: -
Steps to Reproduce: -
1.
2.
3.
Actual results: e dge
Expected results: edge
Additional info:
Thanks for correcting these typos.
https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora-amateur-radio-guide/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 11 months