[Bug 2094692] New: Older release link in the main page has error at
Japanese language page
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094692
Bug ID: 2094692
Summary: Older release link in the main page has error at
Japanese language page
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Component: homepage
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: qqke6wd9k(a)apricot.ocn.ne.jp
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
At Japanese translation Page of Doc start page,
Only "Older release" is link error. so Page Not Found.
Japanese Doc : https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ja/docs/
English-US Doc : https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/docs/
I already reported gitlab Fedora Docs page, but not response, so I report in
Bugzilla,
https://gitlab.com/fedora/docs/docs-website/pages/-/issues/1
not only Japanese but also fr, de , same link error happened.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
every times,
Steps to Reproduce:
1. go https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/docs/
2. change language from English to another non-English kanguage (ja ,fr,de, and
so on)
3. click "older release"
Actual results:
If language is Japanese, the page go
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ja/Fedora/26/html/Release_Notes/index.html
this is "page not found" page
Expected results:
go https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/Release_Notes/index.html
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094692
1 hour, 12 minutes
[Bug 2037234] New: [getfedora.org] Fedora help menu is not
contextual to the current edition
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037234
Bug ID: 2037234
Summary: [getfedora.org] Fedora help menu is not contextual to
the current edition
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Status: NEW
Component: homepage
Severity: medium
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pprinett(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
On all pages of getfedora.org I am presented with a blue header bar containing
three menus: "Editions", "Help" and "Wiki". Those items are universal in the
context of Fedora: when clicking on "Help->Documentation" for example, I am
asked to choose from all possible help topics independently of the page I am
currently seeing. This behaviour, which is easy to understand on the Fedora
home page, can be confusing when I land (say, from a search engine) directly on
the page of a specific Fedora edition.
For example: upon landing on the Fedora IoT downloads page[1], I might want to
check the docs. If I click on "Help->Documentation" (the only apparent link to
the docs), I am presented a list of many products to choose from, whereas I
expected to navigate in the context of Fedora IoT.
Perhaps the problem could be solved by simply adding a "Documentation" link
next to "Overview" and "Download" in the gray header bar, which (as opposed to
the blue one) is apparently contextual to the specific edition I am seeing.
[1]: https://getfedora.org/en/iot/download/
[2]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037234
1 hour, 14 minutes
[Bug 2037222] New: [getfedora.org] Fedora IoT download formats are
not documented
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037222
Bug ID: 2037222
Summary: [getfedora.org] Fedora IoT download formats are not
documented
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Status: NEW
Component: homepage
Severity: medium
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pprinett(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
On the Fedora IoT downloads page[1], I am presented with two formats: "Raw
Images" versus "Installer ISOs". It is not explained why I would choose one
over the other.
[1]: https://getfedora.org/en/iot/download/
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora IoT 35
How I got there:
1. I searched 'Fedora iot' in your favourite search engine
2. I landed on 'https://getfedora.org/iot/'
3. I clicked 'Download' in the top right-hand corner of the page
Actual results:
I am presented the two format options without any explanation
Expected results:
I am presented the download format that matches the documentation
Additional info:
In the Fedora IoT documentation[2], neither the words "Raw Image" nor
"Installer ISO" seem to be ever mentioned.
In both the "Getting Started" sections "Setting up a Virtual Machine" and
"Setting up a Physical Device", the command-line examples refer to the
downloaded file as `Ferora-IoT-[version].raw.xz` (and not .iso).
[2]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037222
1 hour, 16 minutes
[Bug 1878577] New: Grammar Mistake
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878577
Bug ID: 1878577
Summary: Grammar Mistake
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Status: NEW
Component: documentation-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ali.cruz(a)me.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Target Milestone: ---
Group: fedora_contrib_private
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1714711
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1714711&action=edit
Grammar mistake
Document URL: selinux-managing-confined-services-guide
Section Number and Name: LOGO
Describe the issue: DOUMENTACIÓN de Fedora
Suggestions for improvement:
Additional information: selinux-managing-confined-services-guide
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
2 hours, 26 minutes