On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:48 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:

On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:52 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:

...

Bcc: rhel-devel@redhat.com, cyborg@redhat.com

Cockpit is the modern Linux admin interface. We release regularly. Here are the release notes from version 227:

https://cockpit-project.org/blog/cockpit-227.html

Summary:

• Machines: Virtual machine list filtering
• Continued PatternFly 4 migration

You can get Cockpit here: http://cockpit-project.org/running.html

Cockpit 227 is available in Fedora 32 and 33: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5dc4f5b8f5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-02c8c858ae

Or download the tarball here: https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/releases/tag/227

Is it intentional in this release that the Path item on the detail screen for systemd services changed from being blue (and presumably a link) to being black and not a link? I think it was caused by 00510197cc1cf28001637bec48abbb7115ceddaf but I'm not sure whether it was on purpose.

Hey Adam,

to my knowledge the Path item never was blue and a link. I checked with versions 225 and 226 and in both it is just black and non-clickable - as we expect it to be.

Can you provide us with screenshots of such behaviour? Mostly just from curiosity as it seems to be fixed now - or maybe there is actually some problem going on somewhere.

Thanks! MM

Hello Adam,

Adam Williamson [2020-09-03 11:41 -0700]:

Ahh, sorry, I was misinterpreting the test failure - I forgot a little wrinkle about what it does at the point where it failed. What's changed is actually just that the "Requires" text looks a bit different now than it used to. What I forgot is that if that doesn't match, the test does a little fallback check whether it actually didn't reach the "service details" screen at all and is still at the "Services" screen (this is a thing that happened at one point, sometimes the click got eaten or something); that was throwing me off. Never mind, then, sorry again!

Please don't be sorry, we are really grateful for the additional verification! I just feel sad about breaking it all the time with little PatternFly design changes.

That "click got eaten" fallback sounds worrisome, though -- does that still happen? We did have a few cases in Cockpit where clicks had *two* effects instead of one, like immediately closing a dialog again. But that sounds different than your description.

Thanks!

Martin