On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:12:39 +0200, you wrote:
>Sergio Pascual wrote:
>>> If I understood well, our better (and only ?) option if we want IRAF
>>> in Fedora is to push it to our trac server and work hard, right ? ( i
>>> do not consider the waiting solution )
>>
>> Yes, that's my opinion. But I would like to hear some others.
>
>Sadly true that it's our last solution.
An alternative is to not include iraf in Fedora directly but instead
package it up for RPM Fusion (
rpmfusion.org).
While obviously not ideal it does at least get iraf packaged for
Fedora, and a project to replace the non-free bits could still go
ahead without the pressure of getting iraf in as soon as possible.
It looks like a good compromise. But it must be considered only as a
*temporary* solution.
--
Michael Ughetto (Telimektar)
<telimektar1er(a)gmail.com> || <telimektar(a)esraonline.com>
0x8ECBA2A4 on