On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 14:59 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 08:49 -0400, David Shea wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 06:59 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > As we are only calling the createrepo utility with
> > the path to the folder containing the RPM files,
> > no changes other than changing the command name
> > when calling createrepo and changing the package
> > name in the spec file should be needed.
> >
> > Martin Kolman (1):
> > Use createrepo_c in place of createrepo
> >
> > anaconda.spec.in | 2 +-
> > pyanaconda/packaging/yumpayload.py | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> If this is for python3 because yum will not be part of the brave new
> python3 world, and the only place we use createrepo is in yumpayload,
> what's the point?
Yeah, I also kinda wondered about that. But the code using it is part of
the driver disk machinery, so I guess it will just be moved somewhere
once yumpayload is nuked. Because how could we even LIVE without driver
disk support! ;-)
Exactly. Actually, it should be used in the DNFPayload as well,
but
DNFPayload is "Did Not Finish", you know.
--
Vratislav Podzimek
Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic