On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:39 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:43:30PM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 14:59 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 08:49 -0400, David Shea wrote:
> > > On 06/27/2014 06:59 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > > > As we are only calling the createrepo utility with
> > > > the path to the folder containing the RPM files,
> > > > no changes other than changing the command name
> > > > when calling createrepo and changing the package
> > > > name in the spec file should be needed.
> > > >
> > > > Martin Kolman (1):
> > > > Use createrepo_c in place of createrepo
> > > >
> > > > anaconda.spec.in | 2 +-
> > > > pyanaconda/packaging/yumpayload.py | 2 +-
> > > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > If this is for python3 because yum will not be part of the brave new
> > > python3 world, and the only place we use createrepo is in yumpayload,
> > > what's the point?
> > Yeah, I also kinda wondered about that. But the code using it is part of
> > the driver disk machinery, so I guess it will just be moved somewhere
> > once yumpayload is nuked. Because how could we even LIVE without driver
> > disk support! ;-)
> Exactly. Actually, it should be used in the DNFPayload as well, but
> DNFPayload is "Did Not Finish", you know.
I should probably move it up into PackagePayload.
Sounds good to me.
--
Vratislav Podzimek
Anaconda Rider | RHCE | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic